Research Article | Vol. 6, Issue 1 | Journal of Clinical Medical Research | Open Access

Exploring Side Effects and Discontinuation Reasons of Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Agonist (Liraglutide, Semaglutide) for Weight Loss Among Patients at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah in 2021 to 2023

Nesrain Mubarak Alhamedi1*, Lamis Awad Alassiri3, Atheer Mohammed AlMalki3, Ghaythah Hamed Alkhathami3, Dima Mohammed Alsulami3, Relam Ibrahim Alhassani3, Fatima Saeed Allakhmi3, Hala Hisham Mosli2

1Department of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
3College of Medicine, King-Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

*Correspondence author: Nesrain Mubarak Alhamedi, Department of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia;
Email: [email protected]

Citation: Alhamedi NM, et al. Exploring Side Effects and Discontinuation Reasons of Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Agonist (Liraglutide, Semaglutide) for Weight Loss Among Patients at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah in 2021 to 2023. Jour Clin Med Res. 2025;6(1):1-12.

Copyright© 2025 by Alhamedi NM, et al. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received
04 February, 2025
Accepted
21 February, 2025
Published
28 February, 2025

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a metabolic syndrome that poses adverse health effects and established outcomes. Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1-RAs), are a class of injectable anti-diabetic medications that are approved for obesity and chronic weight management. There’s not enough data on how possible Side Effects (SE) affect reasons for discontinuing GLP1-RAs. Our aim in this study is to examine the common side effects and reasons for discontinuation of GLP1-RAs (liraglutide, semaglutide) in a tertiary care hospital.

Methods: A cross-sectional phone-interview analysis, included users of GLP1-RAs in a large tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia between 2021 and 2023. A pre-made data collection sheet based on previous literature was used to acquire data from the record system and patients were contacted via phone interview method. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic characteristics and outcomes. Fisher’s exact test was employed to assess the statistical differences in the outcomes of interest.

Results: The study analyzed a total of 354 patients, with the majority being females (79.1%), aged between 45 and 60 years (33.3%), and presenting a median weight of 85.0 kg (IQR: 74.0-97.0) along with a median BMI of 32.4 kg/m² (IQR: 28.8-36.6). Side effects were reported in 80.2% of participants, with nausea and vomiting being the most frequently documented. No significant differences were observed in the development of side effects across various age groups (p=0.356). However, depression was significantly more prevalent among patients aged 45 to 60 years (20.4%, p=0.005), while nausea was notably more common in patients under 30 years and those aged 30 to less than 45 years (100% and 85.7%, respectively, p=0.011). Prolonged use of GLP-1 receptor agonists (more than six months) significantly reduced the incidence of common side effects (28%, p<0.001) and was associated with substantial weight loss of 20 kg or more (24.3%, p<0.001). Despite these benefits, over half of the participants (73.4%) discontinued the medication due to various reasons, including unclear personal decisions (45.8%), cost-related issues (21.9%), and scheduling challenges (20%).

Conclusion: GLP1-RAs users for weight loss particularly, long-acting GLP1-RAs, suffer from a high likelihood of SE development, predominantly nausea and vomiting, that could interplay and cause discontinuation and medication ineffectiveness.

Keywords: GLP1-Ras; Liraglutide; Semaglutide; Side Effects; Discontinuation; Weight Loss

Introduction

The proglucagon cleavage product, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1), is synthesized by L cells in the intestinal mucosa and is believed to function as a hormone, relaying signals from the intestine to the endocrine pancreas via the circulatory system, as plasma GLP-1 levels rise following food intake [1]. GLP-1 stimulates pancreatic beta cells to reduce glucagon secretion and increase insulin release [2]. Additionally, some of this hormone can cross the blood-brain barrier to activate brain regions that promote satiety [3]. In patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), GLP-1 receptor agonists-an injectable class of anti-diabetic medications—enhance glycemic control and improve several atherosclerosis-related markers [2]. These agents are also effective in managing obesity by slowing gastric emptying, which lowers postprandial blood glucose, reduces calorie intake, and sometimes necessitates gradual dose adjustments to mitigate potential side effects [5]. For weight management, a higher dose (3.0 mg) is recommended, while a 1.8 mg dose is commonly used for T2D treatment [4]. Among commonly prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonists, Saxenda accounts for 39.4% of usage, followed by Ozempic (37.5%) and Trulicity (14.4%), with an additional 8.8% of patients using a combination of these medications. A cross-sectional study in Abha revealed that obesity was the primary reason for GLP-1 usage (48.1%), followed by T2D (30.6%), type 1 diabetes mellitus (13.8%), and gestational diabetes mellitus (7.5%). Commonly reported side effects included nausea and vomiting (51.3%), mood changes (40.6%), indigestion (33.8%), dizziness and hypoglycemia (33.8%), and either diarrhea or constipation (25%). Approximately 38.6% of participants lost 4-7 kg, while 31% lost 1-3 kg, though 6.3% did not achieve any weight loss. Additionally, 56.3% of participants achieved an HbA1c level below 7.5% [6]. With the increasing use of GLP-1 receptor agonists, gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, and constipation are frequently observed [8]. These adverse effects may be linked to the activation of both central and peripheral GLP-1 receptors and could arise from direct or indirect interactions with the central nervous system, activation of afferent parasympathetic pathways or effects on brain regions unprotected by the blood-brain barrier [8-19]. Other mechanisms may involve altered secretion of gastrointestinal peptides, delayed gastric emptying, or changes in intestinal motility [11,12]. GLP-1 receptor agonists can be categorized as short-acting (exenatide, lixisenatide) or long-acting (liraglutide, dulaglutide, extended-release exenatide, and semaglutide) based on their plasma half-life. Short-acting agents tend to lower Postprandial Glucose (PPG) more effectively and delay gastric emptying to a greater extent than long-acting agents, thereby decreasing the rate of post-meal glucose spikes [9,20]. However, prolonged exposure to long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists may induce tachyphylaxis, resulting in diminished effects on gastric emptying over time [12,21]. Notably, delayed gastric emptying associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists has been linked to nausea, with prolonged-acting agents exhibiting a potentially reduced impact on gastric motility, thereby decreasing nausea [3,21,23]. By mimicking endogenous incretin hormones, GLP-1 receptor agonists improve glycemic control while reducing the risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain commonly associated with insulin therapy [24-27]. In 2017, a real-world survey explored reasons for non-adherence to GLP-1 receptor agonists among T2D patients and their physicians. The survey revealed a preference for oral over injectable therapies as a primary cause of non-compliance, reported by 56% of patients and 33% of physicians. Commonly cited reasons for discontinuation included gastrointestinal side effects, with 64% experiencing nausea and 45% reporting vomiting, as well as cost and limited perceived efficacy [24]. Notably, exenatide has been associated with acute kidney injury in several cases, primarily due to hemodynamic disturbances from nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea [3,28-34]. Other side effects include nasopharyngitis, headaches, minor increases in heart rate, and injection site reactions, though these rarely lead to discontinuation [3]. Currently, there is limited research on the side effects and reasons for discontinuation of GLP-1 receptor agonists, particularly liraglutide and semaglutide, among patients using these agents for weight management in Jeddah, specifically at King Abdulaziz University. This study aims to investigate the side effects and discontinuation reasons for GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide, semaglutide) in this population between 2023 and 2024.

Method and Materials

This cross-sectional study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) (Ref: 623-23). A non-probability convenience sampling technique was utilized to select patients from the Medicine and Family Medicine departments at KAUH in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The study covered the period between January 2021 and January 2023. Given the observational nature of the study, informed consent was waived. A total of 354 adult patients, aged 18 years and older, who had been prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonists (Liraglutide, Semaglutide) specifically for weight management, were included. Patients under the age of 18 or those receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists for other medical indications were excluded from the study.

Clinical Data

Patient data were carefully gathered from hospital medical records and supplemented with information obtained through phone interviews. Data collection tools included a pre-designed Google Form and Microsoft Excel, ensuring organized and consistent data entry. The dataset encompassed a wide range of patient information, such as demographics, comorbidities, reasons for discontinuing GLP-1 receptor agonists, and any reported side effects. A standardized data collection sheet, developed based on previous studies, was employed to ensure comprehensive and accurate data gathering from both the medical record system and phone interviews.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was conducted using RStudio software (R version 4.3.1). Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, and medians with Interquartile Ranges (IQR), were used to summarize demographic characteristics and outcomes. Fisher’s exact test was employed to assess the statistical differences in the development of side effects between different age groups and durations of using GLP-1 receptor agonists. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical Statement

The project did not meet the definition of human subject research under the purview of the IRB according to federal regulations and therefore, was exempt.

Results

Demographic Characteristics of Patients

The study included a total of 354 patients. One-third of patients were between the ages of 45 and 60 years (33.3%), followed closely by those aged 60 years or more (32.8%). The majority of participants were female (79.1%) and Saudi nationals (79.7%). The median weight of the patients was 85.0 kg (IQR 74.0 – 97.0), the median height was 162.0 cm (IQR 156.0 – 168.0), and the median BMI was 32.4 kg/m2 (IQR 28.8 – 36.6). Most patients were classified as obese (64.2%), 26.7% were overweight and 9.1% had a healthy BMI (Table 1).

Characteristics and Outcomes of Using GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Regarding the duration of use, 41.2% of the patients used GLP-1 receptor agonists for more than 6 months, while 30.5% used them for 3 to 6 months and 24.9% for less than 3 months (Fig. 1 and Table 2). The median weight loss was 6.0 kg (IQR 3.0 – 11.0); the frequency distribution of weight loss is depicted in Fig. 2. The majority experienced a weight loss of 1 to less than 10 kg (46.6%), followed by 10 to less than 20 kg (22.4%), and 20 kg or more (13.8%, Table 2).

A significant proportion of patients (73.4%) stopped using GLP-1 receptor agonists, among whom the most common reason for stopping was personal choice, reported by 45.8% of the patients. Cost was the second most common reason, cited by 21.9% of the patients, followed by issues with the medication schedule (20.0%, Fig. 3).

Interestingly, 63.6% of patients under study did not reach their weight loss goals (Table 2). Side effects were reported by 80.2% of the patients. Nausea was the most commonly reported side effect, affecting 77.5% of those who reported side effects. Loss of appetite and vomiting were both reported by 36.6% of the patients each. Abdominal pain was experienced by 33.8%, while headache was reported by 19.0% (Fig. 4).

Statistical Differences in the Development of Side Effects Between Different Age Groups

There were no significant differences in the development of side effects among different age groups (p=0.356). Among patients who experienced side effects (n=284), depression was significantly more common in patients aged 45 to 60 years (20.4%) compared to other age groups, with a p-value of 0.005. Nausea was significantly more common in patients under 30 years (100%) and 30 to less than 45 years (85.7%) compared to older age groups, with a p-value of 0.011 (Table 3).

Statistical Differences in the Development of Side Effects Between Different Groups of Duration of Using GLP-1 Agonists

The duration of using GLP-1 receptor agonists significantly affected the development of side effects and weight loss categories. Patients using GLP-1 agonists for more than 6 months were associated with experiencing weight loss of 20 kg or more (24.3%) compared to those using it for 3 to 6 months (7.4%) or less than 3 months (6.8%) (p < 0.001). Side effects were significantly less common in patients using GLP-1 agonists for more than 6 months (28.8%) compared to those using it for less than 3 months (90.9%) and 3 to 6 months (92.6%) (p < 0.001, Table 4).

Abdominal pain was reported significantly more frequently among patients who used GLP-1 receptor agonists for less than 3 months (42.5%) compared to those who used it for 3 to 6 months (38.0%) and for more than 6 months (24.0%, p = 0.019). Depression was significantly more common in patients who used GLP-1 receptor agonists for 3 to 6 months (22.0%) compared to those who used it for more than 6 months (8.0%, p = 0.036). Headaches occurred significantly more often in patients who used GLP-1 receptor agonists for 3 to 6 months (28.0%) compared to those who used it for less than 3 months (17.5%) and for more than 6 months (12.0%, p = 0.029). The incidence in patients using the medication. Vomiting was significantly more frequent among patients who used GLP-1 receptor agonists for less than 3 months (45.0%) and for 3 to 6 months (42.0%) compared to those who used it for more than 6 months (22.0%, p < 0.001, Table 4).

Figure 1: The proportions of duration categories for using a GLP-1 receptor agonist.

Figure 2: The frequency distribution of weight loss in kg.

Figure 3: Primary reasons for stoppage of GLP among patients who stopped the medications (n=260).

Figure 4: The proportions of side effects among patients who reported adverse events (n=284).

Characteristic

Missing

Description

Age

0 (0%)

 

< 30

 

18 (5.1%)

30 to < 45

 

102 (28.8%)

45 to < 60

 

118 (33.3%)

60 or more

 

116 (32.8%)

Gender

0 (0%)

 

Male

 

74 (20.9%)

Female

 

280 (79.1%)

Nationality

0 (0%)

 

Saudi

 

282 (79.7%)

Non_Saudi

 

72 (20.3%)

Weight (kg)

0 (0%)

85.0 (74.0 – 97.0)

Height (cm)

2 (0.6%)

162.0 (156.0 – 168.0)

BMI (kg/m2)

2 (0.6%)

32.4 (28.8 – 36.6)

BMI

2 (0.6%)

 

Healthy

 

32 (9.1%)

Overweight

 

94 (26.7%)

Obese

 

226 (64.2%)

n (%); Median (IQR)

Table 1: Demographic characteristics of patients.

Characteristic

Missing

Description

Duration of use

0 (0%)

 

< 3 months

 

88 (24.9%)

3 to 6 months

 

108 (30.5%)

> 6 months

 

146 (41.2%)

Unknown

 

12 (3.4%)

Weight loss (kg)

6 (1.7%)

6.0 (3.0 – 11.0)

Weight loss categories

6 (1.7%)

 

None

 

60 (17.2%)

1 to <10 kg

 

162 (46.6%)

10 to <20 kg

 

78 (22.4%)

20 or more kg

 

48 (13.8%)

Stop using a GLP-1 receptor agonist

0 (0%)

 

No

 

86 (24.3%)

Yes

 

260 (73.4%)

Unknown

 

8 (2.3%)

Reached the goal

2 (0.6%)

 

No

 

224 (63.6%)

Yes

 

102 (29.0%)

Unknown

 

26 (7.4%)

Side effect

0 (0%)

 

No

 

58 (16.4%)

Yes

 

284 (80.2%)

Unknown

 

12 (3.4%)

n (%); Median (IQR)

Table 2: Characteristics and outcomes of using GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.

Characteristic

Age (years)

p-value

< 30 
N=18

30 to < 45 
N=102

45 to < 60 
N=118

60 or more 
N=116

Side effect

    

0.356

No

6 (33.3%)

14 (13.7%)

18 (15.3%)

20 (17.2%)

 

Yes

12 (66.7%)

84 (82.4%)

98 (83.1%)

90 (77.6%)

 

Unknown

0 (0.0%)

4 (3.9%)

2 (1.7%)

6 (5.2%)

 

Side effects*

     

Abdominal pain

6 (50.0%)

32 (38.1%)

26 (26.5%)

32 (35.6%)

0.193

Depression

2 (16.7%)

14 (16.7%)

20 (20.4%)

4 (4.4%)

0.005

Anxiety

2 (16.7%)

14 (16.7%)

12 (12.2%)

8 (8.9%)

0.387

Gastritis

0 (0.0%)

10 (11.9%)

6 (6.1%)

4 (4.4%)

0.232

Loss of appetite

8 (66.7%)

32 (38.1%)

32 (32.7%)

32 (35.6%)

0.153

Blurry vision

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.388

Diarrhea

2 (16.7%)

14 (16.7%)

14 (14.3%)

8 (8.9%)

0.398

Fatigue

0 (0.0%)

10 (11.9%)

10 (10.2%)

6 (6.7%)

0.510

Headache

0 (0.0%)

16 (19.0%)

24 (24.5%)

14 (15.6%)

0.148

Hypoglycemia

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

4 (4.1%)

4 (4.4%)

0.205

Dizziness

0 (0.0%)

8 (9.5%)

8 (8.2%)

8 (8.9%)

0.907

Nausea

12 (100.0%)

72 (85.7%)

74 (75.5%)

62 (68.9%)

0.011

Painful injection

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.4%)

2 (2.0%)

2 (2.2%)

>0.999

Acute cholecystitis

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.2%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.338

Thyroid cancer

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.388

Rash and erythema

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.0%)

4 (4.4%)

0.244

Vomiting

6 (50.0%)

34 (40.5%)

36 (36.7%)

28 (31.1%)

0.441

Constipation

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.2%)

1 (1.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.781

Tachycardia

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.388

Unknown

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

4 (4.1%)

4 (4.4%)

0.205

n (%)

Fisher’s exact test

*Data are based on 284 patients who experienced side effects

Table 3: Statistical differences in the development of side of effects between different age groups.

Characteristic

Duration of using GLP-1 receptor agonists

p-value

< 3 months 
N=88

3 to 6 months 
N=108

> 6 months 
N=146

Unknown 
N=12

Weight loss categories

    

<0.001

None

30 (34.1%)

12 (11.1%)

12 (8.6%)

6 (50.0%)

 

1 to <10 kg

52 (59.1%)

54 (50.0%)

52 (37.1%)

4 (33.3%)

 

10 to <20 kg

0 (0.0%)

34 (31.5%)

42 (30.0%)

2 (16.7%)

 

20 or more kg

6 (6.8%)

8 (7.4%)

34 (24.3%)

0 (0.0%)

 

Side effect

    

<0.001

No

8 (9.1%)

8 (7.4%)

42 (28.8%)

0 (0.0%)

 

Yes

80 (90.9%)

100 (92.6%)

100 (68.5%)

4 (33.3%)

 

Unknown

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

4 (2.7%)

8 (66.7%)

 

Side effects*

     

Abdominal pain

34 (42.5%)

38 (38.0%)

24 (24.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.019

Depression

10 (12.5%)

22 (22.0%)

8 (8.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.036

Anxiety

14 (17.5%)

16 (16.0%)

6 (6.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.052

Gastritis

6 (7.5%)

10 (10.0%)

4 (4.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.380

Loss of appetite

32 (40.0%)

40 (40.0%)

30 (30.0%)

2 (50.0%)

0.350

Blurry vision

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.353

Diarrhea

8 (10.0%)

20 (20.0%)

10 (10.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.141

Fatigue

10 (12.5%)

8 (8.0%)

8 (8.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.661

Headache

14 (17.5%)

28 (28.0%)

12 (12.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.029

Hypoglycemia

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.0%)

6 (6.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.099

Dizziness

8 (10.0%)

10 (10.0%)

6 (6.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.657

Nausea

64 (80.0%)

78 (78.0%)

74 (74.0%)

4 (100.0%)

0.669

Painful injection

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

6 (6.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.009

Acute cholecystitis

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.0%)

0 (0.0%)

>0.999

Thyroid cancer

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.353

Rash and erythema

2 (2.5%)

0 (0.0%)

4 (4.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.191

Vomiting

36 (45.0%)

42 (42.0%)

22 (22.0%)

4 (100.0%)

<0.001

Constipation

1 (1.3%)

1 (1.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.751

Tachycardia

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.353

Unknown

6 (7.5%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.022

n (%)

Fisher’s Exact test

*Data are based on 284 patients who experienced side effects

Table 4: Statistical differences in the development of side of effects between different groups of duration of using GLP-1 agonists.

Discussion

In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the side effects and causes of GLP1 (liraglutide, semaglutide) discontinuation in patients who were using it to lose weight. We discovered that a significant portion of patients (80.2%) reported experiencing adverse symptoms, with nausea accounting for the majority (77.5%). The high rate of discontinuations may be explained by the high frequency of adverse effects. Despite this, the two main reasons why 73.4% of patients stopped taking the drug were cost (21.9%) and personal preference (45.8%). The fact that 63.6% of patients failed to meet their weight loss objectives is noteworthy and raises concerns regarding the efficacy and expectations around GLP-1 receptor therapy.

The overall development of adverse effects did not differ significantly between age groups, according to our study (p=0.356). But patients between the ages of 45 and 60 had significantly higher rates of depression (20.4%, p = 0.005), and younger patients (under 45) had higher rates of nausea (85.7%) than older patients (p = 0.011). These results point to variations in certain adverse effects with age, which may help with individualized patient care.

Our findings revealed that the duration of GLP-1 receptor agonist use significantly impacted both adverse effects and weight loss. Patients who used the medication for over six months experienced greater weight loss (20 kg or more in 24.3% of cases, p<0.001) and reported fewer side effects (28.8%, p<0.001) compared to those with shorter usage periods. This pattern suggests the possibility of an adaptation phase, where prolonged use leads to improved tolerability and effectiveness.

In our study, the majority of individuals (80.2%) developed adverse effects from using GLP-1RAs. The most common symptom reported was nausea (77.5%), which was followed by vomiting and loss of appetite (36.6%)  Each of loss of appetite and vomiting was reported by 36.6% of the patients. Abdominal discomfort (33.8%), and headache (19.0%). Given that semaglutide and liraglutide were the drugs evaluated in this research, a large percentage of individuals reporting adverse responses may be explained by the fact that Semaglutide and Liraglutide exhibited the highest rate of adverse events among different GLP-1RAs in a previous real-world analysis [8]. In keeping with previous studies, the majority of GLP-1RA side effects that occur in clinical practice are Gastrointestinal (GI) in nature. These effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and constipation. Side effects seem to be dose-dependent, usually brief, mild to moderate in severity, and primarily occur during the start of treatment and upon uptitration [35]. In a clinical trial, which comprised older patients with overlapping illnesses, the prevalence of GI problems was greater than their counterparts controls [36].

One third of participants in the current study were middle-aged, within the age of 45 to 60 years old, and 79.1% of them were female. According to earlier studies, women experienced more adverse effects than men did (65.89% vs. 30.96%), and the median age of those patients was 56 years [37]. Age and duration of GLP1-RAs use were associated with a higher likelihood of adverse effects. Significantly, adverse effects decrease with extended usage, which may indicate improved tolerance or, conversely, drug tachyphylaxis. The duration of GLP-1 receptor agonist usage was found to have a significant impact on the development of side effects, with patients taking GLP-1 agonists for more than 6 months reporting a lower incidence of side effects (28.8%), compared to those using them for less than 3 months (90.9%) and those using them for 3 to 6 months (92.6%) (p < 0.001). indicating that adverse effects are an  uncommon phenomena after six months of usage and are more common during the initial stages of therapy, which occur within the first three to six months of using the medication as these side effects mostly develop at the beginning and at times of dose increase, this finding is consistent with previous results from several clinical trials that suggested there may be a dose and class effect dependency [35, 38-40].

It was observed that individuals using GLP-1RAs for less than three months experienced a significant increase in both vomiting and abdominal pain; those using the drug for three to six months experienced a delayed onset of headache, and those using it for more than six months experienced a late finding of depression (p = 0.019, p < 0.001, p = 0.029,p = 0.036, respectively). Nausea was also substantially more prevalent in patients under 30 years old (100%) and in individuals 30 to less than 45 years old (85.7%) compared to older age groups (p = 0.011). Depression was significantly more common in patients 45 to 60 years old (20.4%) (p = 0.005). It is implied that age is a factor that may influence the occurrence of depression and nausea in various patient populations. This might be explained by hormonal and metabolic variables that have not yet been identified but may interact with GLP-1RA usage in those specific age groups. This result, however, is at odds with other research that suggested GLP-1RAs had antidepressant effects [41-43]. The study’s self-reported nature may provide an explanation for this finding, since patients may have mistakenly classified feelings of worry, dread, or despair for depression.

Inflammation, mood and appetite hormones, such as cortisol and thyroid hormones, are also said to be regulated by GLP-1 RAs [43-45]. GLP-1 RAs causing anxiety have been reported [46], despite its potential antidepressant effects [41-43]. In fact, complex symptoms including anxiety, sleep difficulties, and depression alleviation may be explained by the GLP-1 RA-related potential change of GABAergic neurotransmission [47,48]. Yet, a recent systematic review analysis of individuals with Type-2 diabetes mellitus identified a dearth of evidence that raised the possibility that GLP-1RA users may experience ambiguous side effects or perhaps see an increase in depression incidence [49].

More than half (73.4%) of GLP-RA users in this study stopped using the drug. Personal issues accounted for 45.8% of the causes, followed by costs (21.9%) and medication schedule (20.0%). In a cross-sectional study that evaluated the reasons for discontinuation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RAs) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, while excluding cost as a factor, it was found that gastrointestinal symptoms, specifically vomiting and nausea were the predominant reasons for discontinuation reported by both patients and physicians [24].  A recent retrospective cohort study found that the percentage of people who stopped taking GLP-1 agonists was 26.2%, 30.8%, and 36.5% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively [50]. Compared to individuals with diabetes mellitus or both conditions combined, obese patients were more likely to discontinue treatment after a year [50].

Regarding GLP-RA effectiveness, 63.6% of research participants did not reach their set weight loss goals. The average weight reduction was 6 kg, 46.6% of individuals lost less than 10 kg, 22.4% lost between 10 and less than 20 kg, and only 13.8% of the participants lost 20 kg or more. As might be expected, those who used the drug for more than six months were substantially more likely to lose twenty kg or more (24.3%, p < 0.001). In a follow-up analysis including 175 patients, those who took GLP-1RAs for three months lost 6.7 kg of weight; those who continued using them for a full year lost 12.3 kg [51]. Additionally, a benefit-harm balance analysis showed that the significant factors influencing the net benefit of weight loss were patient preferences, risk aversion and willingness to accept risks. Even a 5% weight loss may be net beneficial for those who are more eager in decreasing weight and less concerned about the potential risks [52].

The significant prevalence of nausea as a side effect is likely contributing to the high rate of discontinuation, with 73.4% of patients stopping the medication. The distress associated with nausea can lead to negative perceptions of the treatment, prompting individuals to reassess the benefits versus the discomfort they experience. Additionally, the study showed that a substantial number of patients (63.6%) did not reach their weight loss goals, which may have further exacerbated feelings of frustration and disappointment, leading them to stop the medication. Given that nausea can be a challenging side effect to manage, it is crucial for healthcare providers to address this issue directly with patients.

Limitations

Self-Reported Data: The reliance on self-reported side effects and reasons for discontinuation may lead to inaccuracies, as patients might underreport or overreport their experiences.

Sample Size and Demographics: Although 354 patients were included in the study, most of them were Saudi nationals and female, which may limit the applicability of the results to other populations or genders.

Short Follow-Up Period: Participants used GLP-1 receptor agonists for varying lengths of time, thus it’s possible that long-term effects or side effects from prolonged use were not fully captured in the study.

Conclusion

This study highlights the significant side effects and reasons for discontinuation of GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide and semaglutide) among patients seeking weight loss. With 80.2% of participants reporting adverse symptoms, particularly nausea, the high discontinuation rate of 73.4% raises concerns about the efficacy and patient experience with these medications. According to the results, in order to improve patient adherence, healthcare professionals should anticipate possible side effects and establish reasonable goals for weight loss. Further research is necessary to explore long-term effects and to assess the impact of these medications on weight loss.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to specimen collection.

Financial Disclosure

This research did not receive any grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Data Availability

Data is available for the journal. Informed consents were not necessary for this paper.

Author’s Contribution

The authors contributed equally.

References

  1. D’Alessio D. Is GLP‐1 a hormone: Whether and When? Journal of Diabetes Investigation. 2016;7:50-5.
  2. Gorgojo-Martínez JJ, Mezquita-Raya P, Carretero-Gómez J, Castro A, Cebrián-Cuenca A, de Torres-Sánchez A, et al. Clinical recommendations to manage gastrointestinal adverse events in patients treated with Glp-1 receptor agonists: a multidisciplinary expert consensus. J Clinical Medicine. 2022;12(1):145.
  3. Filippatos TD, Panagiotopoulou TV, Elisaf MS. Adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists. The review of diabetic studies. RDS. 2015;11(3):202.
  4. Seo YG. Side effects associated with liraglutide treatment for obesity as well as diabetes. J Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. 2020;30(1):12.
  5. Maselli DB, Camilleri M. Effects of GLP-1 and its analogs on gastric physiology in diabetes mellitus and obesity. Diabetes: from Research to Clinical Practice. 2021;4:171-92.
  6. Humeyed MA, Mater MA, Alshehri SM, Khaled Alshehri N, Zayed KA. Awareness of population regarding GLP-1 (liraglutide and Semaglutide) Prescribing in PHCC in Abha City, KSA. Middle East J Family Medicine. 2020;7(10):79.
  7. Alanazi NK, Ghoraba MA. Effect of Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist (liriglutide) on weight and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending primary care center at security forces hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2020;9(8):3933-6.
  8. Liu L, Chen J, Wang L, Chen C, Chen L. Association between different GLP-1 receptor agonists and gastrointestinal adverse reactions: A real-world disproportionality study based on FDA adverse event reporting system database. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:1043789.
  9. Rayner CK, Wu T, Aroda VR, Whittington C, Kanters S, Guyot P, et al. Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist s in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2021;23(1):136-46.
  10. Horowitz M, Aroda VR, Han J, Hardy E, Rayner CK. Upper and/or lower gastrointestinal adverse events with glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists: I ncidence and consequences. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2017;19(5):672-81.
  11. Farr OM, Sofopoulos M, Tsoukas MA, Dincer F, Thakkar B, Sahin-Efe A, et al. GLP-1 receptors exist in the parietal cortex, hypothalamus and medulla of human brains and the GLP-1 analogue liraglutide alters brain activity related to highly desirable food cues in individuals with diabetes: a crossover, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2016;59:954-65.
  12. Bettge K, Kahle M, Abd El Aziz MS, Meier JJ, Nauck MA. Occurrence of nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea reported as adverse events in clinical trials studying glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists: a systematic analysis of published clinical trials. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2017;19(3):336-47.
  13. Kanoski SE, Fortin SM, Arnold M, Grill HJ, Hayes MR. Peripheral and central GLP-1 receptor populations mediate the anorectic effects of peripherally administered GLP-1 receptor agonists, liraglutide and exendin-4. Endocrinology. 2011;152(8):3103-12.
  14. Baraboi ED, St-Pierre DH, Shooner J, Timofeeva E, Richard D. Brain activation following peripheral administration of the GLP-1 receptor agonist exendin-4. American J Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2011;301(4):R1011-24.
  15. Plamboeck A, Veedfald S, Deacon CF, Hartmann B, Wettergren A, Svendsen LB, et al. The effect of exogenous GLP-1 on food intake is lost in male truncally vagotomized subjects with pyloroplasty. Am J Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2013;304(12):G1117-27.
  16. Hunter K, Hölscher C. Drugs developed to treat diabetes, liraglutide and lixisenatide, cross the blood brain barrier and enhance neurogenesis. BMC Neuroscience. 2012;13:1-6.
  17. Kastin AJ, Akerstrom V, Pan W. Interactions of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) with the blood-brain barrier. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 2002;18:7-14.
  18. Kastin A, Akerstrom V. Entry of exendin-4 into brain is rapid but may be limited at high doses. Int J Obesity. 2003;27(3):313-8.
  19. Secher A, Jelsing J, Baquero AF, Hecksher-Sørensen J, Cowley MA, Dalbøge LS, et al. The arcuate nucleus mediates GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide-dependent weight loss. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2014;124(10):4473-88.
  20. Meier JJ, Rosenstock J, Hincelin-Méry A, Roy-Duval C, Delfolie A, Coester HV, et al. Contrasting effects of lixisenatide and liraglutide on postprandial glycemic control, gastric emptying, and safety parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes on optimized insulin glargine with or without metformin: a randomized, open-label trial. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(7):1263-73.
  21. Nauck MA, Kemmeries G, Holst JJ, Meier JJ. Rapid tachyphylaxis of the glucagon-like peptide 1-induced deceleration of gastric emptying in humans. Diabetes. 2011;60(5):1561-5.
  22. Drucker DJ, Buse JB, Taylor K, Kendall DM, Trautmann M, Zhuang D, et al. Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study. The Lancet. 2008;372(9645):1240-50.
  23. Pratley RE, Nauck MA, Barnett AH, Feinglos MN, Ovalle F, Harman-Boehm I, et al. Once-weekly albiglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral drugs (HARMONY 7): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority phase 3 study. The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology. 2014;2(4):289-97.
  24. Sikirica MV, Martin AA, Wood R, Leith A, Piercy J, Higgins V. Reasons for discontinuation of GLP1 receptor agonists: data from a real-world cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets And Therapy. 2017:403-12.
  25. Association AD. 7. Approaches to glycemic treatment. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:S52-9.
  26. Davidson JA. Incretin-based therapies: focus on effects beyond glycemic control alone. Diabetes Therapy. 2013;4:221-38.
  27. Fabunmi R, Nielsen LL, Quimbo R, Schroeder B, Misurski D, Wintle M, et al. Patient characteristics, drug adherence patterns, and hypoglycemia costs for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus newly initiated on exenatide or insulin glargine. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2009;25(3):777-86.
  28. Filippatos TD, Elisaf MS. Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on renal function. World J Diabetes. 2013;4(5):190.
  29. Johansen OE, Whitfield R. Exenatide may aggravate moderate diabetic renal impairment: a case report. British J Clinical Pharmacology. 2008;66(4):568.
  30. Ferrer-Garcia JC, Martinez-Chanza N, Tolosa-Torrens M, Sanchez-Juan C. Exenatide and renal failure. Diabetic Medicine: A Journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2010;27(6):728-9.
  31. López-Ruiz A, del Peso-Gilsanz C, Meoro-Avilés A, Soriano-Palao J, Andreu A, Cabezuelo J, et al. Acute renal failure when exenatide is co-administered with diuretics and angiotensin II blockers. Pharmacy World and Science. 2010;32:559-61.
  32. Dubois-Laforgue D, Boutboul D, Lévy DJ, Joly D, Timsit J. Severe acute renal failure in patients treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2014;103(3):e53-5.
  33. Weise WJ, Sivanandy MS, Block CA, Comi RJ. Exenatide-associated ischemic renal failure. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(2):e22-3.
  34. US Food and Drug Administration. [Last accessed on: February 21, 2025]

http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/Postma rketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/DrugSafetyInformationforHeathca reProfessionals/ucm188656.htm.

  1. Wharton S, Davies M, Dicker D, Lingvay I, Mosenzon O, Rubino DM, et al. Managing the gastrointestinal side effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists in obesity: recommendations for clinical practice. Postgraduate Medicine. 2022;134(1):14-9.
  2. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375(19):1834-44.
  3. Chen W, Cai P, Zou W, Fu Z. Psychiatric adverse events associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2024;15:1330936.
  4. Wan J, Ferrari C, Tadros M. GLP-1RA Essentials in gastroenterology: Side effect management, precautions for endoscopy and applications for gastrointestinal disease treatment. Gastroenterology Insights. 2024;15(1):191-212.
  5. Ratner RE, Maggs D, Nielsen LL, Stonehouse AH, Poon T, Zhang B, et al. Long‐term effects of exenatide therapy over 82 weeks on glycaemic control and weight in over‐weight metformin‐treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2006;8(4):419-28.
  6. Buse JB, Klonoff DC, Nielsen LL, Guan X, Bowlus CL, Holcombe JH, et al. Metabolic effects of two years of exenatide treatment on diabetes, obesity, and hepatic biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes: An interim analysis of data from the open-label, uncontrolled extension of three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Clinical Therapeutics. 2007;29(1):139-53.
  7. Thomas MK, Lammert LJ, Beverly EA. Food insecurity and its impact on body weight, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and mental health. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports. 2021;15:1-9.
  8. Kim YK, Kim OY, Song J. Alleviation of depression by glucagon-like peptide 1 through the regulation of neuroinflammation, neurotransmitters, neurogenesis, and synaptic function. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2020;11:1270.
  9. Chen X, Zhao P, Wang W, Guo L, Pan Q. The antidepressant effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2024;32(1):117-27.
  10. Mehdi SF, Pusapati S, Anwar MS, Lohana D, Kumar P, Nandula SA, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1: A multi-faceted anti-inflammatory agent. Frontiers in Immunology. 2023;14:1148209.
  11. Kuckuck S, van Der Valk ES, Scheurink AJ, van Der Voorn B, Iyer AM, Visser JA, et al. Glucocorticoids, stress and eating: The mediating role of appetite‐regulating hormones. Obesity Reviews. 2023;24(3):e13539.
  12. Anderberg RH, Richard JE, Hansson C, Nissbrandt H, Bergquist F, Skibicka KP. GLP-1 is both anxiogenic and antidepressant; divergent effects of acute and chronic GLP-1 on emotionality. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;65:54-66.
  13. Chuong V, Farokhnia M, Khom S, Pince CL, Elvig SK, Vlkolinsky R, et al. The Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue semaglutide reduces alcohol drinking and modulates central GABA neurotransmission. JCI Insight. 2023;8(12).
  14. Cooper DH, Ramachandra R, Ceban F, Di Vincenzo JD, Rhee TG, Mansur RB, et al. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists as a protective factor for incident depression in patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2023;164:80-9.
  15. Do D, Lee T, Peasah SK, Good CB, Inneh A, Patel U. GLP-1 receptor agonist discontinuation among patients with obesity and/or type 2 diabetes. JAMA Network Open. 2024;7(5):e2413172-.
  16. Ghusn W, De la Rosa A, Sacoto D, Cifuentes L, Campos A, Feris F, et al. Weight loss outcomes associated with semaglutide treatment for patients with overweight or obesity. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(9):e2231982.
  17. Moll H, Frey E, Gerber P, Geidl B, Kaufmann M, Braun J, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight reduction in people living with obesity but without diabetes: a living benefit-harm modelling study. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;73.

Nesrain Mubarak Alhamedi1*, Lamis Awad Alassiri3, Atheer Mohammed AlMalki3, Ghaythah Hamed Alkhathami3, Dima Mohammed Alsulami3, Relam Ibrahim Alhassani3, Fatima Saeed Allakhmi3, Hala Hisham Mosli2

1Department of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
3College of Medicine, King-Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

*Correspondence author: Nesrain Mubarak Alhamedi, Department of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia;
Email: [email protected]

Nesrain Mubarak Alhamedi1*, Lamis Awad Alassiri3, Atheer Mohammed AlMalki3, Ghaythah Hamed Alkhathami3, Dima Mohammed Alsulami3, Relam Ibrahim Alhassani3, Fatima Saeed Allakhmi3, Hala Hisham Mosli2

1Department of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
3College of Medicine, King-Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

*Correspondence author: Nesrain Mubarak Alhamedi, Department of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia;
Email: [email protected]

Copyright© 2025 by Alhamedi NM, et al. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation: Alhamedi NM, et al. Exploring Side Effects and Discontinuation Reasons of Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Agonist (Liraglutide, Semaglutide) for Weight Loss Among Patients at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah in 2021 to 2023. Jour Clin Med Res. 2025;6(1):1-12.