Asiya Sameer Mujawar1*, Varsha Pandit2, Madhuri Patil3, Vivek Hegde4, Naqiya Khandwawala5, Srilatha S6, Sumaiyya Shaikh7
1Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MA Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, PhD Scholar Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to Be University, Dental College and Hospital, Pune India
2Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, PhD Guide Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to Be University, Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India
3Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MA Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, Pune India
4Professor and HOD, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MA Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, Pune India
5Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Westbay Medicare Doha, Qatar
6Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MA Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, Pune India
7Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, India
Correspondence author: Asiya Sameer Mujawar, MDS, Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MA Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, PhD Scholar Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to Be University, Dental College and Hospital, Pune India;
E-mail: [email protected]
Published Date: 20-03-2024
Copyright© 2024 by Mujawar AS, et al. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Regenerative endodontics is an innovative field within dentistry that aims to restore damaged dental pulp using stem cells, tissue engineering techniques and biocompatible materials. This article provides an overview of the current trends in regenerative endodontics, highlighting recent research findings. Stem cells obtained from different sources like dental pulp, bone marrow and adipose tissue possess the ability to differentiate into cells similar to dental pulp and facilitate the regeneration of tissues. The use of biocompatible substances, such as Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) biodentine, offers an ideal setting for tissue growth and healing. Dental scaffolds, made from biodegradable materials, support the development of new blood vessels, nerve fibers and dental pulp-like tissues. Growth factors, like PDGF and TGF-β, are incredibly important in stimulating cell growth and specialization. Researchers and clinical trials are currently working on improving regenerative endodontic procedures, with promising results seen in terms of pulp regeneration and root development. By embracing these trends, dental professionals can offer innovative solutions for restoring damaged dental pulp and preserving natural teeth. The present article, is an overview of regenerative endodontics, exploring the current trends that are shaping the future of this field.
Keywords: Regeneration; Endodontics; Growth Factors; Scaffolds; Stem Cells
Introduction
Regenerative endodontics is an emerging field within dentistry that aims to restore the health and vitality of damaged dental pulp. By utilizing the regenerative capacity of stem cells, tissue engineering techniques and biocompatible materials, regenerative endodontics offers a favorable alternative to traditional root canal treatments. Regenerative endodontics is defined as biologically based procedures designed to physiologically replace damaged tooth structure, including dentin and root structures, as well as the pulp-dentin complex. Clinical Considerations for a Regenerative Procedure, published by the American Association of Endodontists (AAE), states that the regenerative procedure is deemed successful if clinical symptoms and signs are eliminated, apical periodontitis is resolved, the canal walls thicken and/or root maturation continues [1]. The concept of regenerative endodontics is based on tissue engineering, a field that utilizes stem cells, growth factors and scaffolds to support the regeneration of dental pulp and the tissues surrounding it. A study conducted by Huang, et al., highlights the potential of stem cells in regenerating damaged dental pulp [2]. The researchers demonstrated that stem cells derived from various sources, including dental pulp, bone marrow and adipose tissue, can differentiate into dental pulp-like cells, stimulating the growth of healthy tissues.
Biocompatible materials play a crucial role in regenerative endodontics by providing a favorable environment for tissue regeneration. Calcium hydroxide and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) are widely used bioactive materials that promote the healing process and support the growth of new tissues. A comprehensive review by Li, et al., discusses the benefits and applications of these materials in regenerative endodontics, emphasizing their biocompatibility and ability to induce tissue repair and regeneration [3].
Dental scaffolds have emerged as a key trend in regenerative endodontics, providing a three-dimensional structure that supports cell growth and guides tissue formation. A study by Zhang, et al., explores the potential of biodegradable scaffolds in regenerating dental pulp [4]. The researchers developed a scaffold comprised of polycaprolactone and hydroxyapatite, demonstrating its ability to support the formation of new blood vessels, nerve fibers and dental pulp-like tissues.
During the regenerative process, growth factors like PDGF and TGF-β play a crucial role in stimulating cell proliferation and differentiation. Their presence is essential for promoting the growth and specialization of cells. A review article by Chen, et al., discusses the role of growth factors in regenerative endodontics, highlighting their ability to enhance tissue regeneration and improve the success rate of endodontic treatments [5].
According to study by Murray, et al., presents the results of a clinical trial investigating the use of stem cells and scaffolds in regenerating immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis, demonstrating promising outcomes [6].
Methodology and Search Strategy
The relevant literature regarding the regenerative endodontics was searched by electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar and web of science. Articles published in the English language were included in the current review.
Historical Background
Iwaya and associates introduced the term ‘revascularization’. Later, revitalization rather than revascularization was advocated as a more appropriate phrase because the tissues regenerated in the canal space included both hard and soft tissues. The American Association of Endodontists adopted the term’ regenerative endodontics’ in 2007 which is based on tissue engineering idea. The experimental research of Nygaard-Ostby and Nygaard-Ostby and Hjortdal laid the groundwork for regenerative endodontics. To partially fill the chemo-mechanically debrided canal space of teeth, Nygaard-Ostbyand Hjortdal induced bleeding from the periapical tissues [7].
The European Society of Endodontology (ESE) utilized the term “revitalization” in their 2016 position statement. Revascularization, revitalization and regenerative endodontics are terms that are interchangeably and synonymously used in the endodontic literature.
Cell Navigation in Regenerative Endodontics
Regenerating dental pulp tissue in the root canal space necessitates the creation of new vital tissue in an empty, disinfected environment. The three aspects necessary for tissue regeneration are stem cells, growth factors and scaffolds.
Stem Cells
Dental Pulp Stem Cells (DPSCs) and Their Regenerative Potential: Dental Pulp Stem Cells (DPSCs) are considered a promising cell source for regenerative endodontics due to their multipotent nature and accessibility [4]. DPSCs can be isolated from the dental pulp tissue of extracted teeth, providing a readily available and ethically acceptable source of stem cells [8]. These cells possess the ability to differentiate into dental pulp-like cells, including odontoblasts, fibroblasts and endothelial cells, which are crucial for pulp regeneration [8,9]. SCAP, derived from the developing apical papilla, possess similar properties to DPSCs and exhibit high regenerative capacity. A study by Wang, et al., investigated the regenerative potential of SCAP in treating immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis [11]. The results demonstrated successful pulp revascularization and continued root development, highlighting the therapeutic potential of SCAP in regenerative endodontic procedures.
DFSCs, isolated from the dental follicle tissue surrounding developing teeth, have also shown the capacity to differentiate into dental pulp-like cells [12,13]. Studies have reported favorable outcomes, including the regeneration of functional dental pulp, continued root development and improved tooth vitality.
Growth Factors
Growth factors are polypeptides or proteins that, when bound, give rise to a broad range of cellular activities such as migration, proliferation, differentiation and maturation [13-15]. Growth factors play a crucial role in regeneration endodontics by promoting the repair and regeneration of dental tissues within the tooth. Here are some of the key growth factors used in this field: Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs): BMPs are a family of growth factors that are known to induce the formation of bone and dentin [13,16,17]. They are often used in regenerative endodontic procedures to stimulate the differentiation of stem cells into odontoblast-like cells, which are responsible for dentin formation. Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β): TGF-β is a growth factor that plays a pivotal role in various cellular processes, including tissue regeneration [17]. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF): VEGF is crucial for angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels. In regenerative endodontics, it can help ensure proper vascularization within the regenerated dental tissues, providing essential nutrients and oxygen for the developing structures [18]. Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF): FGFs are involved in tissue repair and regeneration. In the context of regeneration endodontics, FGFs can aid in the growth and differentiation of various cell types, including those responsible for dentin formation [19]. Platelet-Derived Growth Factors (PDGF): PDGFs are naturally occurring growth factors found in platelets. They play a role in wound healing and tissue repair. In regenerative endodontics, PDGFs can be used to enhance the regenerative process by stimulating cell proliferation and tissue formation [20]. Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF): IGF is essential for the growth and development of various tissues. It can be utilized to promote the differentiation and proliferation of dental pulp stem cells, contributing to the regeneration of dental tissues [20]. Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF): EGF is known for its role in cell growth and proliferation [18-20]. It can be applied in regenerative endodontics to encourage the proliferation of cells involved in the regeneration of dental pulp and dentin. These growth factors, often used in combination with stem cells, provide a supportive environment for tissue regeneration within the tooth. They can be delivered through various methods, such as scaffolds, gels or other carriers, to maximize their effectiveness in promoting the healing and regeneration of dental tissues in regenerative endodontic procedures.
Scaffolds
In regenerative endodontics, a variety of scaffold types are utilized to support tissue regeneration within the root canal [18]. These include polymeric scaffolds, crafted from biocompatible materials like Polylactic Acid (PLA) or Polyglycolic Acid (PGA), offering customizable mechanical properties and degradation rates. Natural biomaterial scaffolds, derived from sources such as collagen or chitosan, closely mimic the native extracellular matrix, fostering cell attachment and differentiation. Ceramic scaffolds, composed of materials like hydroxyapatite or tricalcium phosphate, provide a rigid framework conducive to tissue ingrowth and mineralization [19]. Composite scaffolds combine different materials, enabling tailored mechanical and bioactive properties. Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (ECM) scaffolds, derived from natural tissues, retain native tissue architecture and composition, creating an optimal microenvironment for cell colonization and regeneration [18-20]. Each scaffold type presents distinct advantages, allowing for tailored approaches to tissue engineering in regenerative endodontics.
REP Protocol
According to the AAE Clinical protocol the REP should be done in two appointments with an interval of 3-4 weeks (Fig. 1,2 and Table 1).

Figure 1: Flow chart of steps in Regenerative endodontic procedure as per AAE 2021.

Figure 2: Diagrammatic representation of steps in regenerative endodontic procedure in a mature tooth.
Author and Year of Publication | Study population | Intervention | Comparison | Outcome | Follow-up |
Jadhav, et al., [33] | 20 patients (6 females, 14 males); Age group (15-28 y); Immature anterior teeth | G1: REP with PRP (n=10) 1st visit- Irrig: 2.5 % NaOCl; TAP intracanal dressing. 2nd visit- Induction of bleeding, placement of PRP covered with sterile collagen sponge; access cavity sealed with RMGIC | G2: REP without PRP (n=10) 1st visit-Irrig: 2.5 % NaOCl; TAP intracanal dressing. 2nd visit- Induction of bleeding, placement of sterile collagen sponge over BC; access cavity sealed with RMGIC | Clinical-complete resolution of signs and symptoms. R/F-satisfactory periapical healing, apical closure and dentinal wall thickening | 12 months |
Nagy, et al., [34] | 36patients (18 females, 18 males); age group (9-13 y); Immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors. | REP group G1: (BC scaffold) (n=12) G2: BC+ FGF (n=12) 1st visit: Irrig: 2.6% NaOCl; intracanal dressing TAP (metronidazole (500-mg +ciprofloxacin (250-mg + doxycycline 100 mg) (3 weeks) 2nd visit: Scaffold (150 mg FGF + 300 mL phosphate-buffered saline + 2-mg dried gelatin hydrogel sheet. Restoration (MTA and Adhesive composite resin) | REP: G3: MTA apical plug (control) Irrig: 2.6% NaOCl; intracanal dressing TAP (metronidazole (500-mg +ciprofloxacin (250-mg + doxycycline 100 mg) (3 weeks) 2nd visit: Placement of MTA plug (4-5 mm) and access cavity sealed with temporary restoration. 1week later: root canal obturation and restoration Adhesive composite resin) | Radiographic evidence of periapical healing G1 and G2 showed a progressive increase in root length and width and a decrease in apical diameter. | 18 months |
Narang, et al., [35] | 20 patients; Age group (below 20 y); Immature necrotic permanent teeth with or without associated apical periodontitis | REP groups G1: (BC) scaffold G2: (PRP+collagen) scaffold G3: (PRF or PRFM) scaffold 1 visit: Irrig: 2.5 % NaOCl, placement of TAP (4 weeks) 2nd visit: bleeding induced, placement of scaffolds, placement of 3-4 mm of RMGIC followed by composite resin. | G4: MTA apexification Placement of (4-5 mm) apical plug After 1-week obturation followed by placement of adhesive composite resin. | PRF accelerate the growth characteristics in immature necrotic permanent teeth as compared to PRP and BC. | 6-18 months |
Sharma, et al., [36] | 16 patients; age group (10-25 y), Necrotic immature permanent maxillary incisors with or without periapical lesions | REP Groups according to scaffolds G1: PRF G2: Collagen G3: PLGA (Poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid) 1st visit: Irrig: 2.5 % NaOCl (side vented needle), +TAP (interappointment medicament) for 4 weeks; 2nd visit: blood clot induced in the root canal, REP using different scaffolds, access cavity sealed with GIC. | G4: BC (blood clot) First visit: Irrig: 2.5 % NaOCl (side vented needle), +TAP (interappointment medicament) for 4 weeks; second visit: REP on frank bleeding tight cotton pellet placed in coronal portion (7-10 min) to induce clot formation), access cavity sealed with GIC. | Clinical outcome All the patients were asymptomatic. R/F: Improved periapical healing, apical closure, root lengthening and dentinal wall thickening | 6-12 months |
Jiang, et al., [37] | 43 patients (children) yielding 46 non-vital immature teeth | REP Groups according to scaffolds G1: REP with Bioguide 1st visit-I rrig: provided twice- 1.25%NaOCl (20 ml;5min) followed by saline (20ml/canal) +Ca (OH)2 intracanal dressing (2 weeks) 2nd visit- Bleeding induced in the canal and placement of bioguide (middle third of the root)+ placement of MTA (ProRoot) followed by adhesive resin | G2: REP without Bioguide (control) First visit-Irrig: provided twice-i) 1.25%NaOCl (20 ml;5min) followed by saline (20ml/canal) +Ca (OH)2 intracanal dressing (2 weeks) 2 nd visit- Bleeding induced in the canal + placement of MTA (ProRoot) followed by adhesive resin | Clinical outcome: Complete resolution of clinical signs and symptoms R/F: thickness of the dentin wall in the middle third of the root was higher with the use of Bioguide collagen than the control group | 6 months |
Ulusoy AT, et al., [38] | 77 patients (33 girls and 44 boys); age group (8-11 y); 88 Necrotic immature permanent incisors | REP Groups according to the scaffolds (n=17) G1: PRP G2: PRF G3: PP G4: BC 1st visit: Irrig: 1.5%NaOCl (20ml) + intracanal dressing (4 weeks) TAP (20mg)(clindamycin,ciprofloxacin and metronidazole) 2nd visit: Irrig: 2% CHX,17 % EDTA (2min) placement of scaffold followed by MTA placement and coronal restoration with composite resin | Control group was not used- conventional Endodontic procedures using different apexification techniques do not permit an increase in root dimensions and apical closure. | Clinical outcome: positive response to sensitivity test R/F outcome: increased root length and apical closure seen | 6 months |
Aly, et al., [39] | 26 patients; necrotic immature permanent anterior teeth | REP Groups according to coronal plug G1: Biodentin 1st visit- Irrig:1.5%NaOCl (20 ml/canal,5min) +saline, DAP (Metronidazole 500mg+Ciprofloxacin 500 mg) (time:4 weeks) 2nd visit: bleeding induced formation of blood clot+ Biodentin (3-4 mm) placement over the blood clot, access cavity sealed with composite resin | G2: MTA First visit- Irrig:1.5%NaOCl (20 ml/canal,5 min) +saline, DAP (Metronidazole 500mg+Ciprofloxacin 500 mg) (time:4 weeks) 2nd visit: bleeding induced+ formation of blood clot+ MTA (3-4 mm) placement over the blood clot, access cavity sealed with composite resin | Clinical outcome: successful resolution of swelling, pain on percussion, pain on biting, mobility sinus or fistula. R/F: increase in root length | 12 months |
El Sheshtawy, et al., [40] | 26 patients; necrotic immature permanent anterior teeth | REP groups G1: platelet-rich plasma (PRP, test group) 1st visit: Irrig: 20 mL of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl; TAP (intracanal dressing Minocycline 100mg+ciprofloxacin 250 mg +Metronidaz500 mg) 2nd visit: induction of bleeding in the canal; placement of PRP followed by collagen plug; covered with MTA. 3rd visit- Final restoration using composite resin | G2: Blood clot (BLC, control group) 1st visit: Irrig: 20 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl; TAP (intracanal dressing Minocycline 100mg+ciprofloxacin 250 mg +Metronidaz500 mg) 2nd visit: induction of bleeding in the canal; placement collagen plug; covered with MTA. 3rd visit- Final restoration using composite resin | Standardized and calibrated 2-dimensional radiographic assessment was as effective as CBCT in assessing RET outcomes. Clinical outcome: successful resolution of swelling, pain on percussion, pain on biting, mobility sinus or fistula. R/F: increase in root length | 12 months |
Arslan, et al., [41] | 49 patients; age group (18-30 y), 56 mature teeth with large periapical lesions | REP group 1st visit: Triple antibiotic paste intracranial dressing (Doxycycline+metronidazole+ciprofloxacin), Time (3 weeks) 2nd visit: Irrig: 5 ml 1 % NaOCl+2 ml 5% EDTA for 1 min; bleeding induction for blood clot formation), placement of MTA 3 mm below the CEJ followed by temporary dressing 3 rd visit: permanent restoration using resin composite material. | CRCT group- 1st visit: Irrig: (5 ml )1 % NaOCl+ 5 % EDTA; Ca(OH)2 intracanal dressing( 1 week ) 2nd visit: Canals filled with gutta- percha cones and epoxy resin-based sealer-cold lateral compaction | . Clinical outcome- 80% of teeth in CRCT and 92.3% teeth in REP group were considered successful 2. Radiographic outcome: Absence and reduction of apical lesions in 85% CRCT compared to 92.4 %of REP group | 12 months |
Brizuela, et al., [42] | 36 patients (25 females, 11 males; age group (16-58 y), mature incisors, canine, premolars with apical lesions | G1: REP group 1st visit- Ca(OH)2 intracranial dressing (time-3 weeks) 2nd Visit: PRP encapsulated human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in a plasma-derived biomaterial) | G2: CRCT group 1st visit: Ca(OH)2 intracranial dressing (time-3 weeks) 2nd visit: Obturation with gutta- percha cones Topseal sealer- continuous wave condensation technique) | 1 Clinical outcome: Safety- No adverse reactions observed throughout the follow-up periodP Positive response to thermal test and EPT 2. Radiographic outcome: Successful cases of healing | 12 months |
El- Kateb, et al., [43] | 18 patients (11 females, 7 males; age group (20-34 y), 18 mature necrotic maxillary anteriors with apical lesions (17 maxillary central incisors, 1 lateral incisor) | G1: REP with rotary instrumentation (PTN- X3) (test) 1st visit: Irrig: 20 ml 1.5%NaOCl, Ca(OH)2 intracanal dressing, 2nd visit: Irrig: final rinse of 17% EDTA, bleeding induction for blood clot formation and placement of Biodentine. Final coronal restoration with RMGIC (base)+ composite resin | G2: REP with rotary instrumentation (PTN- X5) (control) (clinical procedure similar for test and control group) | Clinical outcome: satisfactory (No pain, sensitivity to percussion or swelling) Radiographic outcome: digital radiographic healing of periapical lesions | 12 months |
Jha, et al., [44] | 30 patients (age range, 9-15 y); permanent mature teeth with apical lesions | G1: REP (EDTA SealBio technique 1st visit: Irrig: Negative pressure (Endovac) 2.5% NaOCl; TAP intracanal dressing (2 weeks) 2nd visit: Irrig: 17 %EDTA,induction of bleeding (#15, 20 K file)+ calcium sulfate-based cement) , followed by coronal restoration | G2: NSRCT 1st visit: Irrig: Negative pressure (Endovac) 2.5% NaOCl; TAP intracanal dressing (2 weeks) 2 visit: obturation with gutta-percha cones-cold lateral condensation technique) | Clinical and radiographic outcome-Successful healing | 18 months |
Liang, et al., [45] | 346 patients (age range overall (10-59 y); (mature permanent teeth diagnosed with pulp necrosis) | REP (calcium hydroxide and EDTA 17%/ bleeding induction for blood clot formation and placement of i-PRF into the root canal to a level of 3mm below CEJ/covered with i-Root BP plus | REP (calcium hydroxide and EDTA 17%/ bleeding induction for blood clot formation to a level of 3mm below CEJ/BC covered by 3mm layer of i-Root BP plus | Successful healing (combined clinical and radiographic findings) | 24 months |
REP- Regenerative Endodontic Procedure; CEJ- cemento-Enamel Junction; TAP- Triple Antibiotic Paste; DAP-Double Antibiotic Paste; PRP-Platelet Rich Plasma; PRF-Platelet Rich Fibrin; PP-Platelet Pellet; BC-Blood Clot; Irrig- Irrigation; bFGF- Fibroblast Growth Factor; NaOCl- Sodium Hypochlorite; EDTA-Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid; CHX- Chlorhexidine; MTA-Mineral Tri-Oxide Aggregate; Ca(OH)2- Calcium Hydroxide; CRCT-conventional root canal treatment /NSRCT- Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment; PTN-Protaper Next; RMGIC- Resin Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement | |||||
Table 1: Summary of studies included in the present literature review (Immature and Mature teeth).
Future Directions
Cell Sheets (Fig. 2)
It represents an innovative approach in the field of regenerative medicine, offering a three-dimensional structure that mimics native tissue architecture [21]. This technique involves cultivating monolayers of cells along with their extracellular matrix, providing a scaffold-free platform for tissue engineering [21]. What sets cell sheets apart is their ability to preserve cell-to-cell communication and maintain the integrity of cellular interactions. This promotes a more natural microenvironment upon transplantation, potentially enhancing the engraftment and functionality of the cells [21]. The versatility of cell sheets extends across various tissues and organs, making them a promising tool for addressing critical injuries, degenerative diseases and congenital anomalies. While the field is rapidly advancing, challenges such as scalability and standardization need to be addressed for widespread clinical application [21,22]. Despite these challenges, cell sheets hold great promise for revolutionizing regenerative medicine by harnessing the collective power of cells in a manner that closely resembles the intricate dynamics of native tissues (Fig. 3).

Figure 3: Advances in stem cell-based techniques.
Conclusion
This literature review highlights regenerative endodontics, from its present practices to promising prospects on the horizon. Through a rigorous examination of existing research, it is evident that regenerative techniques such as stem cell therapy and scaffold development have opened new avenues in endodontics we thus, conclude that regenerative endodontics is still an evolving field and has a promising scope with favorable results and improved treatment prognosis for the management of non-vital immature as well as mature teeth with periapical lesions.
Conflict of Interests
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
References
Review Article
Received Date: 16-02-2024
Accepted Date: 12-03-2024
Published Date: 20-03-2024
Copyright© 2024 by Roy Mujawar AS, et al. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Mujawar AS, et al. Regenerative Endodontics -Present Practice to Promising Prospects: A Literature Review. J Dental Health Oral Res. 2024;5(1):1-12.

Figure 1: Flow chart of steps in Regenerative endodontic procedure as per AAE 2021.

Figure 2: Diagrammatic representation of steps in regenerative endodontic procedure in a mature tooth.

Figure 3: Advances in stem cell-based techniques.
Author and Year of Publication | Study population | Intervention | Comparison | Outcome | Follow-up |
Jadhav, et al., [33] | 20 patients (6 females, 14 males); Age group (15-28 y); Immature anterior teeth | G1: REP with PRP (n=10) 1st visit- Irrig: 2.5 % NaOCl; TAP intracanal dressing. 2nd visit- Induction of bleeding, placement of PRP covered with sterile collagen sponge; access cavity sealed with RMGIC | G2: REP without PRP (n=10) 1st visit-Irrig: 2.5 % NaOCl; TAP intracanal dressing. 2nd visit- Induction of bleeding, placement of sterile collagen sponge over BC; access cavity sealed with RMGIC | Clinical-complete resolution of signs and symptoms. R/F-satisfactory periapical healing, apical closure and dentinal wall thickening | 12 months |
Nagy, et al., [34] | 36patients (18 females, 18 males); age group (9-13 y); Immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors. | REP group G1: (BC scaffold) (n=12) G2: BC+ FGF (n=12) 1st visit: Irrig: 2.6% NaOCl; intracanal dressing TAP (metronidazole (500-mg +ciprofloxacin (250-mg + doxycycline 100 mg) (3 weeks) 2nd visit: Scaffold (150 mg FGF + 300 mL phosphate-buffered saline + 2-mg dried gelatin hydrogel sheet. Restoration (MTA and Adhesive composite resin) | REP: G3: MTA apical plug (control) Irrig: 2.6% NaOCl; intracanal dressing TAP (metronidazole (500-mg +ciprofloxacin (250-mg + doxycycline 100 mg) (3 weeks) 2nd visit: Placement of MTA plug (4-5 mm) and access cavity sealed with temporary restoration. 1week later: root canal obturation and restoration Adhesive composite resin) | Radiographic evidence of periapical healing G1 and G2 showed a progressive increase in root length and width and a decrease in apical diameter. | 18 months |
Narang, et al., [35] | 20 patients; Age group (below 20 y); Immature necrotic permanent teeth with or without associated apical periodontitis | REP groups G1: (BC) scaffold G2: (PRP+collagen) scaffold G3: (PRF or PRFM) scaffold 1 visit: Irrig: 2.5 % NaOCl, placement of TAP (4 weeks) 2nd visit: bleeding induced, placement of scaffolds, placement of 3-4 mm of RMGIC followed by composite resin. | G4: MTA apexification Placement of (4-5 mm) apical plug After 1-week obturation followed by placement of adhesive composite resin. | PRF accelerate the growth characteristics in immature necrotic permanent teeth as compared to PRP and BC. | 6-18 months |
Sharma, et al., [36] | 16 patients; age group (10-25 y), Necrotic immature permanent maxillary incisors with or without periapical lesions | REP Groups according to scaffolds G1: PRF G2: Collagen G3: PLGA (Poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid) 1st visit: Irrig: 2.5 % NaOCl (side vented needle), +TAP (interappointment medicament) for 4 weeks; 2nd visit: blood clot induced in the root canal, REP using different scaffolds, access cavity sealed with GIC. | G4: BC (blood clot) First visit: Irrig: 2.5 % NaOCl (side vented needle), +TAP (interappointment medicament) for 4 weeks; second visit: REP on frank bleeding tight cotton pellet placed in coronal portion (7-10 min) to induce clot formation), access cavity sealed with GIC. | Clinical outcome All the patients were asymptomatic. R/F: Improved periapical healing, apical closure, root lengthening and dentinal wall thickening | 6-12 months |
Jiang, et al., [37] | 43 patients (children) yielding 46 non-vital immature teeth | REP Groups according to scaffolds G1: REP with Bioguide 1st visit-I rrig: provided twice- 1.25%NaOCl (20 ml;5min) followed by saline (20ml/canal) +Ca (OH)2 intracanal dressing (2 weeks) 2nd visit- Bleeding induced in the canal and placement of bioguide (middle third of the root)+ placement of MTA (ProRoot) followed by adhesive resin | G2: REP without Bioguide (control) First visit-Irrig: provided twice-i) 1.25%NaOCl (20 ml;5min) followed by saline (20ml/canal) +Ca (OH)2 intracanal dressing (2 weeks) 2 nd visit- Bleeding induced in the canal + placement of MTA (ProRoot) followed by adhesive resin | Clinical outcome: Complete resolution of clinical signs and symptoms R/F: thickness of the dentin wall in the middle third of the root was higher with the use of Bioguide collagen than the control group | 6 months |
Ulusoy AT, et al., [38] | 77 patients (33 girls and 44 boys); age group (8-11 y); 88 Necrotic immature permanent incisors | REP Groups according to the scaffolds (n=17) G1: PRP G2: PRF G3: PP G4: BC 1st visit: Irrig: 1.5%NaOCl (20ml) + intracanal dressing (4 weeks) TAP (20mg)(clindamycin,ciprofloxacin and metronidazole) 2nd visit: Irrig: 2% CHX,17 % EDTA (2min) placement of scaffold followed by MTA placement and coronal restoration with composite resin | Control group was not used- conventional Endodontic procedures using different apexification techniques do not permit an increase in root dimensions and apical closure. | Clinical outcome: positive response to sensitivity test R/F outcome: increased root length and apical closure seen | 6 months |
Aly, et al., [39] | 26 patients; necrotic immature permanent anterior teeth | REP Groups according to coronal plug G1: Biodentin 1st visit- Irrig:1.5%NaOCl (20 ml/canal,5min) +saline, DAP (Metronidazole 500mg+Ciprofloxacin 500 mg) (time:4 weeks) 2nd visit: bleeding induced formation of blood clot+ Biodentin (3-4 mm) placement over the blood clot, access cavity sealed with composite resin | G2: MTA First visit- Irrig:1.5%NaOCl (20 ml/canal,5 min) +saline, DAP (Metronidazole 500mg+Ciprofloxacin 500 mg) (time:4 weeks) 2nd visit: bleeding induced+ formation of blood clot+ MTA (3-4 mm) placement over the blood clot, access cavity sealed with composite resin | Clinical outcome: successful resolution of swelling, pain on percussion, pain on biting, mobility sinus or fistula. R/F: increase in root length | 12 months |
El Sheshtawy, et al., [40] | 26 patients; necrotic immature permanent anterior teeth | REP groups G1: platelet-rich plasma (PRP, test group) 1st visit: Irrig: 20 mL of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl; TAP (intracanal dressing Minocycline 100mg+ciprofloxacin 250 mg +Metronidaz500 mg) 2nd visit: induction of bleeding in the canal; placement of PRP followed by collagen plug; covered with MTA. 3rd visit- Final restoration using composite resin | G2: Blood clot (BLC, control group) 1st visit: Irrig: 20 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl; TAP (intracanal dressing Minocycline 100mg+ciprofloxacin 250 mg +Metronidaz500 mg) 2nd visit: induction of bleeding in the canal; placement collagen plug; covered with MTA. 3rd visit- Final restoration using composite resin | Standardized and calibrated 2-dimensional radiographic assessment was as effective as CBCT in assessing RET outcomes. Clinical outcome: successful resolution of swelling, pain on percussion, pain on biting, mobility sinus or fistula. R/F: increase in root length | 12 months |
Arslan, et al., [41] | 49 patients; age group (18-30 y), 56 mature teeth with large periapical lesions | REP group 1st visit: Triple antibiotic paste intracranial dressing (Doxycycline+metronidazole+ciprofloxacin), Time (3 weeks) 2nd visit: Irrig: 5 ml 1 % NaOCl+2 ml 5% EDTA for 1 min; bleeding induction for blood clot formation), placement of MTA 3 mm below the CEJ followed by temporary dressing 3 rd visit: permanent restoration using resin composite material. | CRCT group- 1st visit: Irrig: (5 ml )1 % NaOCl+ 5 % EDTA; Ca(OH)2 intracanal dressing( 1 week ) 2nd visit: Canals filled with gutta- percha cones and epoxy resin-based sealer-cold lateral compaction | . Clinical outcome- 80% of teeth in CRCT and 92.3% teeth in REP group were considered successful 2. Radiographic outcome: Absence and reduction of apical lesions in 85% CRCT compared to 92.4 %of REP group | 12 months |
Brizuela, et al., [42] | 36 patients (25 females, 11 males; age group (16-58 y), mature incisors, canine, premolars with apical lesions | G1: REP group 1st visit- Ca(OH)2 intracranial dressing (time-3 weeks) 2nd Visit: PRP encapsulated human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in a plasma-derived biomaterial) | G2: CRCT group 1st visit: Ca(OH)2 intracranial dressing (time-3 weeks) 2nd visit: Obturation with gutta- percha cones Topseal sealer- continuous wave condensation technique) | 1 Clinical outcome: Safety- No adverse reactions observed throughout the follow-up periodP Positive response to thermal test and EPT 2. Radiographic outcome: Successful cases of healing | 12 months |
El- Kateb, et al., [43] | 18 patients (11 females, 7 males; age group (20-34 y), 18 mature necrotic maxillary anteriors with apical lesions (17 maxillary central incisors, 1 lateral incisor) | G1: REP with rotary instrumentation (PTN- X3) (test) 1st visit: Irrig: 20 ml 1.5%NaOCl, Ca(OH)2 intracanal dressing, 2nd visit: Irrig: final rinse of 17% EDTA, bleeding induction for blood clot formation and placement of Biodentine. Final coronal restoration with RMGIC (base)+ composite resin | G2: REP with rotary instrumentation (PTN- X5) (control) (clinical procedure similar for test and control group) | Clinical outcome: satisfactory (No pain, sensitivity to percussion or swelling) Radiographic outcome: digital radiographic healing of periapical lesions | 12 months |
Jha, et al., [44] | 30 patients (age range, 9-15 y); permanent mature teeth with apical lesions | G1: REP (EDTA SealBio technique 1st visit: Irrig: Negative pressure (Endovac) 2.5% NaOCl; TAP intracanal dressing (2 weeks) 2nd visit: Irrig: 17 %EDTA,induction of bleeding (#15, 20 K file)+ calcium sulfate-based cement) , followed by coronal restoration | G2: NSRCT 1st visit: Irrig: Negative pressure (Endovac) 2.5% NaOCl; TAP intracanal dressing (2 weeks) 2 visit: obturation with gutta-percha cones-cold lateral condensation technique) | Clinical and radiographic outcome-Successful healing | 18 months |
Liang, et al., [45] | 346 patients (age range overall (10-59 y); (mature permanent teeth diagnosed with pulp necrosis) | REP (calcium hydroxide and EDTA 17%/ bleeding induction for blood clot formation and placement of i-PRF into the root canal to a level of 3mm below CEJ/covered with i-Root BP plus | REP (calcium hydroxide and EDTA 17%/ bleeding induction for blood clot formation to a level of 3mm below CEJ/BC covered by 3mm layer of i-Root BP plus | Successful healing (combined clinical and radiographic findings) | 24 months |
REP- Regenerative Endodontic Procedure; CEJ- cemento-Enamel Junction; TAP- Triple Antibiotic Paste; DAP-Double Antibiotic Paste; PRP-Platelet Rich Plasma; PRF-Platelet Rich Fibrin; PP-Platelet Pellet; BC-Blood Clot; Irrig- Irrigation; bFGF- Fibroblast Growth Factor; NaOCl- Sodium Hypochlorite; EDTA-Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid; CHX- Chlorhexidine; MTA-Mineral Tri-Oxide Aggregate; Ca(OH)2- Calcium Hydroxide; CRCT-conventional root canal treatment /NSRCT- Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment; PTN-Protaper Next; RMGIC- Resin Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement | |||||
Table 1: Summary of studies included in the present literature review (Immature and Mature teeth).