ISSN (Online): 3050-9432

ISSN (Print): 3050-9424

Table of content
Research Article | Vol. 7, Issue 1 | Journal of Dental Health and Oral Research | Open Access

Comparative Evaluation of Bromelain-Quercetin Gel with Chlorhexidine Gel as Subgingival Local Drug Delivery Following Scaling and Root Planning in Stage I /II and Grade B Periodontitis – Randomized Control Clinical Trail


Nallagatta Vamsi Venkatakrishna Sai1ORCID iD.svg 1 , Rudrakshi C2*ORCID iD.svg 1 , MLV Prabhuji3ORCID iD.svg 1


1Post Graduate Student, Department of Periodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, India

2Reader, Department of Periodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, India

3Professor and Head, Department of Periodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, India


*Correspondence author: Rudrakshi C, Reader, Department of Periodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karntaka, India; E-mail: [email protected]

Citation: Sai NVV, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Bromelain-Quercetin Gel with Chlorhexidine Gel as Subgingival Local Drug Delivery Following Scaling and Root Planning in Stage I /II and Grade B Periodontitis – Randomized Control Clinical Trail. J Dental Health Oral Res. 2026;7(1):1-8.


Copyright: © 2026 The Authors. Published by Athenaeum Scientific Publishers.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received
29 December, 2025
Accepted
19 January, 2026
Published
26 January, 2026
Abstract

Background: Periodontitis is a dysbiotic disease affecting the tooth and supporting structures. Different treatment options have been tried in form of nonsurgical and surgical therapy. Antimicrobials agents (plant extracts) have been used as an adjunct to nonsurgical therapy. Pineapple (bromelain) and guava (quercetin) are one such agents. As there is less literature in this combination, we intend to study combination of bromelain and quercetin for treatment in periodontits as gel form. This study will be first of its kind to check the efficacy of 2% bromelain-quercetin gel and to compare its effects with 0.2% Chlorhexidine in stage I/II and Grade B periodontitis.

Material and Methods: Patients with Stage I/II and Grade B periodontitis with periodontal pocket depth measuring ≤5 mm and radiographic evidence of horizontal bone loss were included and treated with local drug delivery bromelain-quercetin gel and chlorhexidine gel following Scaling and Root Planning (SRP) for 3 weeks. Scaling and Root Planning is an integral part of periodontal therapy. Clinical parameters included are Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Modified Sulcular Bleeding Index (mSBI), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) were assessed before intervention and at 21st day. Parameters recorded were statistically analysis will be p < 0.005.

Results: Intragroup comparisons of PPD, CAL, GI, PI and MSBI at 3 weeks does not shows statistically significant results. Intergroup comparison of parameters (PPD, GI, PI, CAL, mSBI) shows statistically significant results between the groups. Intergroup comparison of bromelain-quercetin gel and chlorhexidine gel of clinical parameters shows statistically significant results at baseline and at 3weeks.

Conclusion: The present study favors the use of combination therapy over SRP alone in order to achieve greater pocket depth reduction and greater attachment level gain.

Keywords: Scaling and Root Planning; Dysbiotic Disease; Periodontitis; Antimicrobials Agents


Introduction

Periodontitis a dysbiotic inflammatory disease that induces an irreversible immune state that leads to destruction of the supporting structure of the teeth. Management of periodontal disease through thorough removal of biofilm which is pivotal for having better oral health. Scaling and Root Planning (SRP) forms fundamental treatment for periodontitis [1]. Years of documented research have established that Chlorhexidine di -gluconate (CHX), as gold standard of chemical plaque control agent safe, stable and effective in preventing and controlling plaque formation. A various medicinal herb have been used in periodontal therapy [2]. Bromelain is one such agent derived from Ananas comosus (popularly known as pineapple), contains proteinases that exhibits anti-inflammatory properties, antibacterial effect against periodontopathogens [1]. Bromelain gel has shown to have chemicomechanical property for caries removal [3]. The bromelain ora-base gel evaluated in periodontitis showed a positive response for  clinical parameters tooth mobility, gingival bleeding index and probing pocket depth, myeloperoxidase, malonaldehyde and alveolar bone loss of the oral tissues, preventing alveolar bone resorption caused by the disease, highlighting the potential as an adjuvant treatment of periodontitis, in addition to reducing the systemic effects on the liver tissue [4]. Quercetin, another phytochemical present in guava have excellent antibacterial actions against periodontal pathogens, Aggregatibacter+ actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Prevotella intermedia (Pi) and Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) [5]. 2% Quercetin has shown to be advantageous for subgingival application after scaling and rootplaning [5].

Recently, bromelain-quercetin, in quadruple therapy as adjunct effect in treatment of COVID-19 patients, has shown to have a potent anti-inflammatory action [6]. As there is lack of literature evaluating combination of bromelain-quercetin for treatment in oral cavity, we have used bromelain-quercetin intervention in periodontal therapy. This study is first of its kind to check the efficacy of 2% bromelain-quercetin gel and to compare its effects with 0.2% Chlorhexidine in Stage I/II and Grade B periodontits.

Materials and Methods

Various adjuncts have been explored for their efficacy in restoring periodontal health. Both natural and synthetic material have been used natural variants. This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial has been done in Krishnadevaraya    College of Dental Science and Hospital, Hunasamaranahalli, Bengaluru 562127. The present clinical trial has been done according CONSORT 2013 pro extended.

Ethical Statement

The study has been approved from Institutional Review Board and Ethical Committee (IRB) (Ref: KCDSHEC/IP/2023/V1/P4a). The study has been registered under clinical.gov with registration Identity number is NCT06775392.

The present study included preparation of Bromelain-Quercetin gel and Chlorhexidine gel at Department of Biotechnology, Sir M. Visvesvaraya Institute of Technology, Prepared gel was stored at room temperature before clinical analysis. Cytotoxicity of the prepared gel on human gingival fibroblast was done at Stroma biotechnology lab; Bangalore and the results show no cytotoxicity was observed on human gingival fibroblasts. Patients enrolled for the study were from Out-Patient Department of Periodontology, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental science and Hospital. The gel was used as local drug delivery, as part of non-surgical therapy in patient presenting with Periodontitis. Patients with Stage I/II and Grade B periodontitis were enrolled for the study based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The eligible subjects were informed in detail about the procedure and a written signed consent was obtained from each patient (Table 1).

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

1. Systemically healthy patients

1. Patients who have received any surgical or nonsurgical therapy during past 6 months

2. Patient having ≥ 20 teeth.

2. Pregnant or lactating females.

3.Patients with localized pockets probing depth of ≤5 mm

3. Use of systemic antibiotics in the past 6 months.

4. Patient who have stage I/II and grade B periodontitis in the age group between 30-50 years.

4. Patient who are not willing to give a written informed consent

5. Patient with radiographic evidence of horizontal bone loss in atleast two teeth

 

6. Patients who are cooperative and able to attend the hospital for regular follow-up

 

Table 1: Study criteria.

Study Design

A total of 30 probing sites in stage I/II and Grade B periodontitis patients with Pocket Probing Depth (PPD) ≤5 mm and radiographic evidence of horizontal bone loss were included. The sites selected were divided into groups

  • Group I (Control) -10 Probing sites with probing depth of ≤5 mm were treated with SRP alone
  • Group II -10 Probing sites with probing depth of ≤5 mm were treated with SRP followed by placement of bromelain-quercetin gel
  • Group III –10 Probing sites with probing depth of ≤5mm were treated with SRP followed by placement of chlorhexidine gel

Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and at 3 weeks

  • Plaque Index (PI) (silness and loe 1964) [7]
  • Gingival Index (GI) (loe and silness 1963) [8]
  • Modified Sulcular Bleeding index (MSB) [9]
  • Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) of 5mm recorded with UNC-15 probe
  • Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) recorded with Williams graduated non-colour coded Periodontal probe

Clinical Procedure

All the patients presenting with stage-I/II and Grade B Periodontits satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were subjected to clinical examination and scheduled for periodontal therapy.  Clinical parameters were recorded and considered as baseline values. All patients underwent Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy (NSPT) under oral hygiene phase. Scaling and root planing (SRP) with oral hygiene instructions were executed for all the included patients. A total of 30 probing sites were included for the study [10]. Probing sites were followed up for evaluation for 3 weeks. Remaining 20 probing sites underwent adjunctive therapy along with SRP.  Twenty probing sites received Chlorhexidine gel and Bromelain-Quercetin gel as adjunct, each adjunct comprising of 10 sites. Each probing sites were evaluated at 3 weeks.

Local Drug Delivery

The medicament (Chlorhexidine and Bromelain-Quercetin gel) was placed at the depth of the pocket using tuberculin syringe with applicator tip. This was followed by placement of periodontal dressing (COE-PACK)TM. Patients were instructed following site-specific delivery to maintain oral health.

Post Operative Instructions

Patient were asked to refrain for 60 minutes with any oral activity. They were instructed not to brush the treated area till the removal of the periodontal dressing. Patient were recalled after 12 days for the removal of the periodontal dressing. All Patients was instructed to maintain oral hygiene at regular intervals and were evaluated at 21st day for re-recording the parameters and maintains hygiene by cleaning with damped clean cloth.

Data Analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences [SPSS] for Windows Version 22.0 Released 2013. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp., will be used to perform statistical analyses.

Descriptive Statistics

Descriptive analysis of all the explanatory and outcome parameters will be done using mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables, frequency and proportions for categorical variables.

Inferential Statistics

One-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis / Kruskal Wallis Test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test [based on data distribution] will be used to compare the mean clinical parameters between 3 groups. Repeated Measures of ANOVA Test / Friedman’s Test followed by Wilcoxon Signed Rank Post Test was used to compare the mean clinical parameters between different time intervals in each group. The level of significance [P-Value] will be set at P<0.05 and any other relevant test, if found appropriate during the time of data analysis will be dealt accordingly.

Results

The present study included preparation of the bromelain-quercetin gel and chlorhexidine gel at Department of Biotechnology, Sir M. Visvesvaraya Institute of Technology campus, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental science and Hospital, Bangalore-562157. Bromelain has shown to exhibit various fibrinolytic, antioedematous, antithrombotic, and anti-inflammatory activities both in-vitro and in-vivo. Ever since bromelain was known chemically, it has been used as a phyto medical agent [1]. Quercetin is a group of flavanols found in vegetables, fruits and nuts such as shallots, cranberries, blueberries, tomatoes, broccoli, and apples. It also provides a variety of health benefits and resistance to diseases including anti-carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antioxidant, psychostimulant activity and also ability to inhibiting lipid peroxidation, platelet aggregation, capillary permeability and stimulation of mitochondrial biogenesis. Quercetin has been reported as anti-inflammatory substance that last long and have strong anti-inflammatory capacities. It has demonstrated antimicrobial activity that potentially decrease the inflammatory marker, cholesterol reduction and inhibit bone loss [14]. The following clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and at 21 days. Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI). Modified Sulcular bleeding index (MSB), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) of 5 mm recorded with UNC-15 probe and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) recorded at the selected probing site.

Means scores regarding PPD and GI at baseline shows statistically significant results between the groups whereas mean scores regarding PI, CAL and mSBI between three groups at baseline does not show statistically significant results (Table 2). Mean scores of PPD, CAL, GI, PI and mSBI at 3 weeks does not shows statistically significant results (Table 3). Intergroup comparison of PPD, GI, PI, CAL, MSBI shows statistically significant results between the groups (Table 4). Intragroup comparison of bromelain-quercetin gel and chlorhexidine gel of clinical parameters shows statistically significant results at baseline and 3 weeks (Table 5).

Variables

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

SD

P-value

PPD

Group I

1.00

2.66

3.66

3.1130

.39460

0.03

Group II

1.06

2.10

3.16

2.6870

.37175

Group III

.66

2.50

3.16

2.8470

.22647

CAL

Group I

2.67

6.33

9.00

7.5620

.99653

0.08

Group II

4.66

4.00

8.66

6.8160

1.43089

Group III

2.00

7.00

9.00

7.9400

.81677

PI

Group I

.75

.25

1.00

.5250

.24861

0.36

Group II

.75

.25

1.00

.5500

.25820

Group III

.75

.25

1.00

.6750

.23717

GI

Group I

.50

.25

.75

.5750

.16874

<0.001

Group II

.75

.00

.75

.4750

.21890

Group III

.75

.50

1.25

.9400

.27264

MsBI

Group I

1.00

1.00

2.00

1.6000

.51640

0.69

Group II

1.00

1.00

2.00

1.4000

.51640

Group III

1.00

1.00

2.00

1.5000

.52705

Table 2: Comparison of mean score of different study variable at base line between three group.

Variables

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

SD

P-value

PPD

Group I

1.17

1.33

2.50

1.9570

.44907

0.28

Group II

1.20

1.10

2.30

1.8930

.35030

Group III

.83

1.33

2.16

1.7080

.24462

CAL

Group I

2.67

4.66

7.33

5.8340

.99349

0.41

Group II

4.66

3.00

7.66

5.8820

1.44700

Group III

2.03

5.30

7.33

6.4190

.61363

PI

Group I

.25

.00

.25

.1000

.12910

0.23

Group II

.75

.00

.75

.2000

.22973

Group III

.25

.00

.25

.0750

.12076

GI

Group I

.25

.00

.25

.1750

.12076

0.27

Group II

.25

.00

.25

.1500

.12910

Group III

.50

.00

.50

.2500

.16667

MsBI

Group I

1.00

.00

1.00

.6000

.51640

0.27

Group II

1.00

.00

1.00

.3000

.48305

Group III

2.00

.00

2.00

.7000

.67495

Table 3: Comparison of mean score of different study variable at 3 weeks between three group.

Variables

Time

Mean

SD

SE

P-value

PPD

Group I

Baseline

3.113

0.3946

0.12478

<0.001

3 weeks

1.957

0.44907

0.14201

Group II

Baseline

7.562

0.99653

0.31513

<0.001

3 weeks

5.834

0.99349

0.31417

Group III

Baseline

0.525

0.24861

0.07862

<0.001

3 weeks

0.1

0.1291

0.04082

CAL

Group I

Baseline

0.575

0.16874

0.05336

<0.001

3 weeks

0.175

0.12076

0.03819

Group II

Baseline

1.6000a

0.5164

0.1633

<0.001

3 weeks

.6000a

0.5164

0.1633

Group III

Baseline

2.687

0.37175

0.11756

<0.001

3 weeks

1.893

0.3503

0.11078

PI

Group I

Baseline

6.816

1.43089

0.45249

<0.001

3 weeks

5.882

1.447

0.45758

Group II

Baseline

0.55

0.2582

0.08165

0.001

3 weeks

0.2

0.22973

0.07265

Group III

Baseline

0.475

0.2189

0.06922

<0.001

3 weeks

0.15

0.1291

0.04082

GI

Group I

Baseline

1.4

0.5164

0.1633

<0.001

3 weeks

0.3

0.48305

0.15275

Group II

Baseline

2.847

0.22647

0.07162

<0.001

3 weeks

1.708

0.24462

0.07736

Table 4: Comparison of mean score of different study variable at baseline and 3 weeks within each study group.

Variables

Time

Mean

SD

SE

P-value

PPD

Group II

Baseline

2.6870

0.37175

0.11756

<0.0001

3 weeks

1.8930

0.35030

0.11078

Group III

Baseline

2.8470

0.22647

0.07162

<0.0001

3 weeks

1.7080

0.24462

0.07736

CAL

Group II

Baseline

6.8160

1.43089

0.45249

0.001

3 weeks

5.8820

1.44700

0.45758

Group III

Baseline

7.9400

0.81677

0.25828

<0.0001

3 weeks

6.4190

0.61363

0.19405

PI

Group II

Baseline

0.5500

0.25820

0.08165

<0.0001

3 weeks

0.2000

0.22973

0.07265

Group III

Baseline

0.6750

0.23717

0.07500

<0.0001

3 weeks

0.0750

0.12076

0.03819

GI

Group II

Baseline

0.4750

0.21890

0.06922

<0.0001

3 weeks

0.1500

0.12910

0.04082

Group III

Baseline

0.9400

0.27264

0.08622

<0.0001

3 weeks

0.2500

0.16667

0.05270

SBI

Group II

Baseline

1.4000

0.51640

0.16330

<0.0001

3 weeks

0.3000

0.48305

0.15275

Group III

Baseline

1.5000

0.52705

0.16667

0.003

3 weeks

0.7000

0.67495

0.21344

Table 5: Comparison of mean score of different study variable at baseline and 3 weeks within each study group.

Discussion

Ramification of periodontal disease fueled by dysbiosis results in adverse clinical consequences graded as Periodontitis. Management of periodontal disease has been focused fundamentally toward the disruption of plaque micro-flora which involves the mechanical therapy and use of antimicrobial agents. Wide range of antibiotics have been tried and tested against periodontal pathogens. However, due the side effects of various antimicrobial drugs and development of various antibacterial resistant strains of microorganism, its use has been a challenge [1]. Hence, to overcome the shortcomings of antimicrobials and to increase patient acceptance, a wide array of herbal products and plant extracts have been tried and tested. As there is growing evidence on use of herbal agents as adjunct to Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy (NSPT), the present study utilized the advantages of Bromelain-Quercetin combination gel and have prepared and clinically compared with chlorhexidine gel. Scaling and Root Planing (SRP) alone was used as control group [14].

Pineapple extract (bromelain) is one such product. Pineapple is the universal name of ananas comosus. It belongs to the member of the family bromeliaceae, which is grown in a number of subtropical and tropical countries including, India. The medicinal property of pineapple is due to bromelain which is a rough aqueous extract from stem and fruit of pineapple. It has been used in dentistry as an chemo-mechanical, anti-bacterial anti-inflammatory and analgesic drug [1,3,4]. Another potent plant extract is ‘Quercetin’, a natural plant-derived from dietary polyphenol obtained from Guava possesses high safety profile and extensive beneficial properties including potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, antiviral, anti-hypertensive and anti-aging effects [10-13]. Quercetin has been used to improve the disease outcomes in several disorders including rheumatoid arthritis, neuroinflammation and gastrointestinal disorders. Similarly, emerging evidence also indicates the oral-protective properties of Quercetin [14]. We have used combination of bromelain-quercetin gel as LDD in our study for its beneficial effects, as adjunct to SRP in disease specific site as test sites compared with 0.2 % chlorhexidine gel application as control group. According to Praveen NC, et al., in their study on Streptococcus. mutans showed sensitivity at the lowest concentration of 2 mg/ml as compared to E fecalis (31.25 mg/ml) while P. gingivalis showed sensitivity at the lowest concentration of 4.15 mg/ml as compared to Aa (16.6 mg/ml) with bromelain. Therefore, Bromelain exerts an antibacterial effect against potent periodontal pathogens; hence, it may be used as an antibacterial agent [1]. in our study we have considered application bromelain-quercetin (2%) and chlorhexidine gel (0.2%) following SRP in probing dept ≤5mm as LDD. Our study demonstrated statistically significant improvement in all the parameters.

Hossein, et al., in their study on One-week treatment with Anaheal (bromelain) at a dose of 1 g/d after pocket elimination surgery resulted in significantly lower BOP compared to placebo [15,16]. In our study, we have used Bromelain-Quercetin gel as local drug delivery agent for its antibacterial action. According to Sibarani Mega, et al., evaluated the effect of 2% quercetin gel subgingival application after scaling and root planing on IL-6 concentration of chronic periodontitis patients. The study concluded that quercetin gel application reduced IL-6 concentration in gingival crevicular fluid of chronic periodontitis [3]. In our study, we have used Bromelain-Quercetin gel as LDD for its antibacterial action results in PPD reduction and CAL gain. Mooney, et al., study on Quercetin supplement instigates a balanced periodontal tissue homeostasis through limiting inflammation and fostering an oral cavity microenvironment conducive of symbiotic microbiota associated with health [14]. Our study on Bromelain-Quercetin gel on sub gingival application had significant gain in attachment. Amr K Ahmed, et al., study on Quadruple therapy consisting of Zinc, Quercetin, Bromelain and Vitamin C showed promising results in improving clinical outcome among COVID-19 patients. Present study shows that the treatment of periodontal pockets with chlorhexidine and bromelain-quercetin gel in the maintenance phase provides a significantly greater improvement in clinical parameter when compared with the improvement obtained with SRP alone. There was significant reductions observed in plaque and gingival scores following periodontal intervention. Lower plaque and gingival index scores observed in the test group may also be the result of the antiplaque and antibacterial effect.

Conclusion

The results in the present study thus favor the use of combination therapy over SRP in order to achieve greater pocket depth reduction and greater attachment level gain. The local drug delivery is effective in improving the clinical parameters even after 3 weeks following SRP, when the pockets are stabilized.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding Statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or non-profit sectors.

Acknowledgement

None

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Ethical Statement                                                

The project did not meet the definition of human subject research under the purview of the IRB according to federal regulations, and therefore, was exempt.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was taken for this study.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this paper.

References
  1. Praveen NC, Rajesh A, Madan M, Chaurasia VR, Hiremath NV, Sharma AM. In-vitro evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of pineapple extract (bromelain) on periodontal pathogens. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(5):96.
  2. Pasupuleti MK, Nagate RR, Alqahtani SM, Penmetsa GS, Gottumukkala SN, Ramesh KS. Role of medicinal herbs in periodontal therapy: A systematic review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2023;13(1):9-16.
  3. Reddy VK, Nagar P, Reddy S, Ragulakollu R, Tirupathi SP, Ravi R, et al. Bromelain vs papain gel for caries removal in primary teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(11):1345-9.
  4. Alves EH, Nascimento HM, França LF, Vasconcelos AC, Pessoa LD, Silva FR, et al. Topical application of Orabase bromelain gel reduces inflammatory process, bone loss and steatosis in experimental periodontitis. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2025;68:e25240384.
  5. Sibarani M, Nasution R, Ilyas S, Ervina I, Primasari A. Effect of 2% quercetin gel subgingival application after scaling and root planing on IL-6 concentration of chronic periodontitis patients. 2020.
  6. Ahmed AK, Albalawi YS, Shora HA, Abdelseed HK, Al-Kattan AN. Effects of quadruple therapy: Zinc, quercetin, bromelain and vitamin C on the clinical outcomes of patients infected with COVID-19. Rea Int J End Diabe. 2020;1(1):18-21.
  7. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964;22(1):121-35.
  8. Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963;21(6):533-51.
  9. Mühlemann HR, Son S. Gingival sulcus bleeding: A leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta. 1971;15(2):107-13.
  10. Li Y, Yao J, Han C, Yang J, Chaudhry MT, Wang S, et al. Quercetin, inflammation and immunity. Nutrients. 2016;8(3):167.
  11. Vafadar A, Shabaninejad Z, Movahedpour A, Fallahi F, Taghavipour M, Ghasemi Y, et al. Quercetin and cancer: New insights into its therapeutic effects on ovarian cancer cells. Cell Biosci. 2020;10:1-7.
  12. Colunga Biancatelli RM, Berrill M, Catravas JD, Marik PE. Quercetin and vitamin C: An experimental, synergistic therapy for the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 related disease (COVID-19). Front Immunol. 2020;11:1451.
  13. Serban MC, Sahebkar A, Zanchetti A, Mikhailidis DP, Howard G, Antal D, et al. Effects of quercetin on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(7):e002713.
  14. Malcangi G, Inchingolo AM, Casamassima L, Trilli I, Ferrante L, Inchingolo F, et al. Effectiveness of herbal medicines with anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties in improving oral health and treating gingivitis and periodontitis: A systematic review. Nutrients. 2025;17(5):762.
  15. Mooney EC, Holden SE, Xia XJ, Li Y, Jiang M, Banson CN, et al. Quercetin preserves oral cavity health by mitigating inflammation and microbial dysbiosis. Front Immunol. 2021;12:774273.
  16. Babazade H, Mirzaagha A, Konarizadeh S. The effect of bromelain in periodontal surgery: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):286.

Nallagatta Vamsi Venkatakrishna Sai1ORCID iD.svg 1 , Rudrakshi C2*ORCID iD.svg 1 , MLV Prabhuji3ORCID iD.svg 1


1Post Graduate Student, Department of Periodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, India

2Reader, Department of Periodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, India

3Professor and Head, Department of Periodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, India


*Correspondence author: Rudrakshi C, Reader, Department of Periodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karntaka, India; E-mail: [email protected]

Copyright: © 2026 The Authors. Published by Athenaeum Scientific Publishers.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Citation: Sai NVV, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Bromelain-Quercetin Gel with Chlorhexidine Gel as Subgingival Local Drug Delivery Following Scaling and Root Planning in Stage I /II and Grade B Periodontitis – Randomized Control Clinical Trail. J Dental Health Oral Res. 2026;7(1):1-8.

Crossmark update

Article Metrics

Share this article: