Research Article | Vol. 6, Issue 3 | Journal of Clinical Immunology & Microbiology | Open Access

Clinical Features Associated with A. baumannii BSI Mortality Clinical Features Associated with Acinetobacter baumannii Bloodstream Infections Mortality in a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Brazil


Pedro Olimpio Siqueira Castilho1*, Fernanda Martelli Takahashi1, Maria Julia Onça Moreira1, Larissa Sugiura1, Alanis C Cardoso1, Tatiana de Carvalho Caldas1, Gabriela de Souza Barbosa1, Marcia RE Perugini1, Marsileni Pelisson1, Floristher E Carrara1, Eliana Carolina Vespero1
1Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Health Sciences Center, State University of Londrina, Brazil

*Correspondence author: Pedro Olimpio Siqueira Castilho, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Health Sciences Center, State University of Londrina, Brazil;
Email: [email protected]

Citation: Castilho POS, et al. Clinical Features Associated with A. baumannii BSI Mortality Clinical Features Associated with Acinetobacter baumannii Bloodstream Infections Mortality in a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Brazil. J Clin Immunol Microbiol. 2025;6(3):1-10.

Copyright© 2025 by Castilho POS, et al. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received
10 November, 2025
Accepted
25 November, 2025
Published
02 December, 2025

Abstract

Introduction: Acinetobacter baumannii Bloodstream Infections (BSIs) are associated with high mortality and increasing antimicrobial resistance, particularly in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). The COVID-19 pandemic further intensified these challenges by increasing the frequency and severity of healthcare-associated infections.

Objective: This study aimed to characterize the epidemiological and clinical features of patients with A. baumannii BSI in a Brazilian tertiary hospital and identify risk factors associated with mortality.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study from March 2020 to May 2023 at the University Hospital of Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. Patients with at least one peripheral blood culture positive for A. baumannii were included. Epidemiological, microbiological and clinical data were collected and stratified by survival outcome. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the VITEK 2® system and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v25.0, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: A total of 261 patients with Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections were analyzed. The vast majority of isolates (94.2%) were resistant to meropenem. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 70.5%. Several factors were significantly associated with increased mortality. Among comorbidities, diabetes (OR = 2.71; p = 0.006) and systemic arterial hypertension (OR = 1.88; p = 0.025) were both linked to higher risk of death. In terms of invasive procedures, the presence of indwelling urinary catheters (OR = 4.70; p < 0.001), enteral nutrition tubes (OR = 4.70; p < 0.001), orotracheal intubation (OR = 3.32; p < 0.001) and the need for hemodialysis (OR = 3.81; p < 0.001) were all significantly associated with fatal outcomes. Septic shock was present in 67.4% of patients and had a particularly strong association with mortality (OR = 12.8; p < 0.001). Prior use of certain antimicrobials, particularly third-generation cephalosporins (OR = 2.66; p = 0.002) and carbapenems (OR = 1.95; p = 0.016), also contributed to an increased risk of death. Coinfection with COVID-19, identified in 43.3% of cases, was another significant risk factor for poor outcomes (OR = 1.91; p = 0.022). Patients with COVID-19 had shorter hospital stays and a higher 30-day mortality rate (73.4%) compared to those without COVID-19 (54.7%).

Conclusion: This study highlights a high mortality rate associated with A. baumannii BSIs, driven by antimicrobial resistance, comorbidities, invasive procedures and septic complications. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated these trends. Early identification, targeted empirical therapy and effective infection control are essential to improving outcomes.

Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; Bloodstream Infection; Antimicrobial Resistance; Carbapenem-Resistant; COVID-19; Mortality; Epidemiology

Introduction

Hospital-acquired Bloodstream Infections (BSI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, with Acinetobacter baumannii being one of the most concerning pathogens due to its high mortality rates reaching up 43% in ICU settings and 16% in other wards, making this pathogen the one of the major leading causes of death among nosocomial BSI [1]. A. baumannii is also notable for its extensive antimicrobial resistance, driven by both intrinsic and acquired mechanisms. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) are highly disseminated worldwide. As a result, individuals infected with extensively resistant strains are at increased risk of severe illness and death, with bloodstream infections leading to worse clinical outcomes and fewer effective treatment options [2].

Several risk factors are associated with A. baumannii BSI, for example invasive procedures, prolonged ICU stays, prior antibiotic use, especially carbapenems and underlying health conditions like cancer or immunosuppression. The COVID-19 pandemic further amplified these risks, with high rates of co-infection reported among critically ill patients [1]. Although several studies have reported a high incidence of A. baumannii BSI, as well as a high mortality rate from these infections in the last few years, it is important to maintain constant epidemiological surveillance studies. Therefore, this study aims to perform an epidemiological characterization of patients hospitalized with A. baumannii BSI, identifying factors associated with the outcome of these infections.

Material and Methods

Study Design

A retrospective study was conducted at Hospital Universitário de Londrina in Londrina, PR, Brazil. Patients with positive peripheral blood culture for A. baumannii identified between March 2020 and May 2023 were evaluated. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the State University of Londrina under CAAE number: 28316819.0.0000.523.

Microbiology Identification and Susceptibility Test

Positive peripheral blood cultures were detected by BD BACTEC FX40 (Becton Dickinson, United States). Then, microbial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed by the automated system VITEK 2® (bioMérieux, France). The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing were interpreted according to the criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [3].

Data Collection and Statistical Analysis

Clinical and epidemiological data was obtained using patient’s digital medical records. Data such as age, sex, length of hospital stay, comorbidities, invasive devices, complications, other positive cultures and previous use of antimicrobials were collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to the outcome: survived or died.

The incidence of A. baumannii BSI was calculated by incidence density per 1,000 patient-days. For statistical analysis, the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 25.0, was used. Categorical data were evaluated by the chi-square test; the difference between groups was determined as significant when p < 0.05. The degree of association between the variables and the outcome was assessed through the Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results

Between January 2014 and December 2023, a total of 8,202 A. baumannii isolates were obtained. The distribution of isolates over the years is shown in Fig. 1. During this period, 4,784 (58.3%) isolates were obtained from tracheal aspirates, followed by 857 (10.4%) from tissue and secretions, 796 (9.7%) from urine, 514 (6.3%) from peripheral blood, 91 (1.1%) from liquor and other body fluids and 13 (0.2%) from other materials. Among patients with A. baumannii infections, 5,696 (69.4%) were from patients admitted to the ICU, while 2,506 (30.6%) from patients in general wards. Of all isolates, 334 (4.1%) were susceptible to meropenem, while 7,876 (96.1%) were resistant to carbapenems. Among the resistant isolates, 350 (4.3%) were also resistant to both carbapenems and polymyxins.

From 2020 to 2023, we observed an increase in the incidence density of A. baumannii BSI per 1,000 patient-days (Fig. 2). During this period, 261 A. baumannii isolates were recovered from peripheral blood cultures.

Among the A. baumannii isolates obtained from peripheral blood cultures, 94.2% of the isolates were resistant to meropenem. The resistance rates to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and gentamicin were 94.6%, 91.2% and 84.1%, respectively. Furthermore, 8.9% were resistant to polymyxin, 10 of which were also resistant to carbapenems (Fig. 3). The mortality rate was significantly higher in infections caused by CRAB (p = 0.044), as well as in those caused by isolates resistant to amikacin and gentamicin (p = 0.033 and p = 0.012, respectively).

Demographical and clinical data from patients with A. baumannii BSI are described in Table 1. The average age of patients was 58 years and most patients (58.6%) were male. Furthermore, patients with A. baumannii BSI presented positive peripheral blood culture after an average of 13 days from hospital admission. Most patients had at least one underlying condition, with systemic arterial hypertension (44.4%) and diabetes (24.1%) being the most common. Both conditions were associated with an increased risk of mortality (p = 0.025; OR = 1.88 and p = 0.006; OR = 2.71, respectively). Additionally, 113 (43.3%) patients had a COVID-19 diagnosis. Most patients required invasive procedures such as Central Venous Catheters (CVC) (90.8%), Indwelling Urinary Catheters (IUC) (88.1%) and Mechanical Ventilation (MV) (85%). Among the invasive devices, IUC (p < 0.001; OR = 4.70), enteral nutrition tubes (p < 0.001; OR = 4.70) and orotracheal intubation (p < 0.001; OR = 3.32) were significantly associated with mortality. Patients with BSI also had positive cultures for A. baumannii in tracheal secretions (62.8%), urine (19.5%) and tissue samples (8.43%). During hospitalization, 154 (67.4%) patients with A. baumannii BSI developed septic shock and the majority of these patients (83.7%) died (p < 0.001; OR = 12.8). Prior antibiotic use was common, with 97% of patients receiving at least one antimicrobial, the most frequently used drugs were carbapenems (65.5%), piperacillin-tazobactam (44.4%), polymyxins (36.4%) and third-generation cephalosporins (33.3%), which was associated with higher risk of mortality (p = 0.002; OR = 2.66). After the identification of A. baumannii in peripheral blood culture, the most commonly used drugs were polymyxins (46%), carbapenems (33.3%), colistin (20.7%) and aminoglycosides (18%).

The average hospital length of stay was 38.3 ± 34.3 days. Patients who died had a shorter hospital stay (30.8 ± 28.7 days) compared to those who were discharged (56.3 ± 39.5 days). Similarly, patients with COVID-19 had a shorter hospitalization duration (31 ± 26.6 days) compared to those without COVID-19 (43.9 ± 38.3 days) (Fig.4).

The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 70.5% (184/261), with 62.8% (164/261) dying within 30 days after the identification of A. baumannii in peripheral blood culture. COVID-19 patients were 1.91 times more likely to die than to be discharged (p = 0.022) Among COVID-19 patients, the mortality rate increased to 77.9% (88/113), with 73.4% (83/113) dying within 30 days. In contrast, the 30-day mortality rate for non-COVID-19 patients was 54.7% (81/148).

Figure 1: Number of A. baumannii isolates obtained from patients hospitalized between 2014 and 2023.

Figure 2: Incidence density of A. baumannii bloodstream infections per 1,000 patient-days between 2014 and 2023.

Figure 3: Antimicrobial susceptibility test of A. baumannii isolates obtained from peripheral blood culture between 2020 and 2023.

Figure 4: Hospital length of stay and outcomes of patients with A. baumannii BSI, with and without COVID-19 diagnosis.

Characteristics

Died

N = 184 (70.5%)

Survived

N = 77 (29.5%)

p value

OR

(95% CI)

Age

    

Mean ± SDa

58.4 ± 17.3

44.3 ± 22.1

  

Male sex

99 (53.8%)

54 (70.1%)

0.015

2.04 (1.14 – 3.57)

Hospital length of stay

    

Mean number of days ± SDa

30.8 ± 28.7

56.3 ± 39.5

  

Comorbidities

    

Diabetes

53 (28.8%)

10 (13.0%)

0.006

2.71 (1.30 – 5.66)

Systemic arterial hypertension

90 (48.9%)

26 (33.8%)

0.025

1.88 (1.08 – 3.27)

Smoking

36 (19.6%)

14 (18.2%)

0.796

*

Alcoholism

22 (12.0%)

7 (9.1%)

0.502

*

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

16 (8.7%)

4 (5.2%)

0.332

*

Autoimmune disease

7 (3.8%)

2 (2.6%)

0.626

*

Chronic kidney failure

15 (8.2%)

5 (6.5%)

0.646

*

Cancer

6 (3.3%)

2 (2.6%)

1.000

*

Invasive procedure

    

Indwelling urinary catheter

172 (93.5%)

58 (75.3%)

<0.001

4.70 (2.15 – 10.3)

Central venous catheter

169 (91.8%)

68 (88.3%)

0.367

*

Enteral nutrition tube

162 (88.0%)

47 (61.0%)

<0.001

4.70 (2.48 – 8.90)

Orotracheal intubation

157 (85.3%)

49 (63.6%)

<0.001

3.32 (1.79 – 6.17)

Tracheostomy

58 (31.5%)

21 (27.3%)

0.496

*

Blood transfusion

49 (26.8%)

27 (35.1%)

0.180

*

Drain

19 (10.3%)

5 (6.5%)

0.328

*

Hemodialysis

92 (50.0%)

16 (20.8%)

<0.001

3.81 (2.05 – 7.10)

Septic shock

154 (83.7%)

22 (28.6%)

<0.001

12.8 (6.83 – 24.1)

COVID-19

88 (47.8%)

25 (32.5%)

0.022

1.91 (1,09 – 3.33)

Tracheal secretion culture

118 (64.1%)

46 (59.7%)

0.503

*

Urine culture

39 (21.2%)

12 (15.6%)

0.297

*

Tissue culture

11 (6.0%)

11 (14.3%)

0.228

*

Previous use of antimicrobials

    

Ampicillin sulbactam

11 (6.0%)

5 (6.5%)

1.000

*

Sulfamethoxazole trimethoprim

8 (4.3%)

1 (1.3%)

0.289

*

Piperacillin tazobactam

88 (47.8%)

28 (36.4%)

0.089

*

Ceftazidime avibactam

9 (4.9%)

8 (10.4%)

0.101

*

1st and 2nd Gen. Cephalosporins

1 (0.5%)

2 (2.6%)

0.209

*

3rd Gen. Cephalosporins

72 (39.1%)

15 (19.5%)

0.002

2.66 (1.41 – 5.02)

4th Gen. Cephalosporins

12 (6.5%)

9 (11.7%)

0.162

*

Fluoroquinolones

24 (13.0%)

10 (13.0%)

0.990

*

Polymyxin

71 (38.6%)

24 (31.2%)

0.256

*

Aminoglycosides

29 (15.8%)

19 (24.7%)

0.090

*

Carbapenems

129 (70.1%)

42 (54.5%)

0.016

1.95 (1.13 – 3.38)

Colistin

29 (15.8%)

8 (10.4%)

0.257

*

Tigecycline

27 (14.7%)

9 (11.7%)

0.524

*

* There was no significant statistical difference.

aSD: Standard deviation

Table 1: Demographic and clinical data stratified by mortality from patients with A. baumannii BSI hospitalized between 2020 and 2023.

Discussion

The present study reports an increase in the number of A. baumannii clinical isolates, mainly CRAB, obtained over 10 years. Previous studies in Brazil reported that during COVID-19 pandemics, A. baumannii has become one of the main causes of secondary infections, being isolated mainly from tracheal aspirate (71.2%) and blood cultures (7.2%) particularly in ICUs, a similar profile as observed in the present study [4]. Overall, carbapenem resistance is highly prevalent in this species with resistance rates exceeding 70% in some regions, such as Eastern Europe, Africa and Asia [5]. In Brazil, carbapenem resistance rates reaches up to 80%. making infections caused by this pathogen difficult to treat, leading to worse prognoses and a higher risk of mortality [6].

In this scenario, A. baumannii is one of the leading causes of healthcare-acquired BSI. According to ASCENSION surveillance study, CRAB is responsible for 9.6% of all BSI in Brazil [7]. We observed an increasing A. baumannii BSI incidence rate from 2020 onwards, especially due to the COVID-19 pandemics. However, the impact of COVID-19 on BSI varies across studies. While some studies demonstrate that there was no increase in the incidence of BSI during the pandemic period, others, such as the present study, highlight an increase or a trend towards a higher incidence of BSI after 2020 [8-11].

A previous study carried out in the same institution as this one reported that between 2006 and 2016, 92.2% of BSI A. baumannii isolates were resistant to meropenem, thus we observed a small increase in the rate of resistance to meropenem, that now reaches 94.2%. Moreover, we also observed an increase in the rate of resistance to amikacin (41.7% to 91.2%) and gentamicin (69.9% to 84.1%). On the other hand, the resistance rates to ciprofloxacin and polymyxin B have decreased from 100.0% to 94.6% and 10.7% to 8.9%, respectively [12]. A similar study also observed increasing rates of resistance to carbapenems (64% to 98%) and aminoglycosides (11% to 85%) between 2019 and 2022, possibly associated with prior colonization by resistant strains, extensive use of invasive devices and antimicrobials and prolonged hospitalization, highlighting a trend of increasing resistance rates in clinical isolates of A. baumannii worldwide [13]. According to a systematic review, global resistance rate to polymyxins is 13%, thus polymyxins remain one of the most effective antimicrobials against MDR A. baumannii [14]. However, due to the high consumption of polymyxin to treat CRAB infections in the last few years, several studies in different countries have reported increasing polymyxin resistance rates A. baumannii.  Rocca and colleagues demonstrated a 10% increase in the colistin resistance rate in A. baumannii between 2016 and 2021 [15]. Another study also demonstrated a 37% increase in the colistin resistance rate between 2015 and 2022, reaching 42.5% in the last year. This increase poses a major global health problem, as the spread of strains resistant to these antimicrobials further limits therapeutic choices, leading to worse prognoses and higher mortality [16].

As expected, higher mortality rates were observed in infections caused by carbapenem and aminoglycoside resistant A. baumannii, mainly because these infections are often related to treatment failure. A cohort study demonstrated that MDR A. baumannii infections are associated with greater risk of mortality, risk of reinfections within 30 days and longer length of hospital stay, likely due to inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy, delay to active treatment and consequent increased severity of infection [17].

Similarly, several other clinical factors were also associated with mortality. Male patients presented higher chances of not surviving, which is consistent with findings from other studies that explain this association by the need for admission to intensive care units, higher risk of infection by MDR pathogens and polymicrobial infections [18]. Diabetes and systemic arterial hypertension are underlying conditions that were associated with higher mortality, several studies have reported the association between these comorbidities and A. baumannii bacteremia mortality, moreover other conditions such as chronic liver and kidney diseases, smoking and immunodeficiency are also commonly associated with higher mortality in this type of infection [19-21]. The use of several invasive devices, such as Indwelling Urinary Catheters (IUC), Central Venous Catheters (CVC), Mechanical Ventilation (MV), orotracheal nutrition tubes and hemodialysis, has also been associated with higher mortality. In general, prolonged use of these devices is a risk factor for A. baumannii infections in hospitalized patients, a meta-analysis study showed that patients using CVC and MV were approximately 3 times more likely to develop A. baumannii BSI, due to the potential for biofilm formation and direct access to the bloodstream or respiratory tract [22].

In this study, septic shock was strongly associated with mortality. Other studies have also determined sepsis as an independent risk and predictor of mortality in patients with A. baumanni BSI, increasing the risk of mortality by approximately 3-fold.  Therefore, early and effective empirical therapy is essential to reduce the likelihood of BSI progressing to septic shock [23,24]. Prior use of antimicrobials was also associated with the mortality of A. baumannii BSI. In our study, the use of 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins, such as ceftriaxone and cefepime, was associated with higher mortality, but other studies mainly associate the previous use of carbapenems with higher risk in these infections, this happens because the prior use of these antimicrobials selects increasingly resistant strains that make treatment difficult, leading to therapeutic failure, worse prognoses and an increased risk of mortality [17,18]. Inappropriate empiric therapy significantly increases mortality rates in patients with CRAB infections. Studies have shown that patients who receive inadequate initial treatment have a mortality rate of up to 86% compared with 33.7% for those who receive appropriate therapy [25]. In this scenario, the main treatment for CRAB infections is the use of polymyxins or combination therapy using fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, ampicillin-sulbactam and carbapenems, in some cases, tigecycline is also an effective therapeutic option [17].

Overall, we observed a high mortality rate among patients with A. baumannii BSI, which is expected in these infections. Consistent with our findings, other studies also reported that patients with COVID-19 and A. baumannii coinfection had higher risk of mortality. These findings emphasize the negative impact of COVID-19 on patients with A. baumannii infection, highlighting risk factors common to both infections, such as prolonged ICU stays, use of multiple invasive devices and prior use of antimicrobials as empirical treatment [9,26].

Although our analysis included a wide range of potential risk factors, one limitation of the study is that this study represents a retrospective and single center analysis and may not apply to populations in other regions. Therefore, comparing our results with those from similar studies could help strengthen the development of a reliable model for predicting and reducing mortality risk factors in A. baumannii BSI.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a significant increase in Acinetobacter baumannii Bloodstream Infections (BSI), particularly those caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Strains (CRAB), over the past decade. The rise in antimicrobial resistance especially to carbapenems, aminoglycosides and polymyxins has made treatment increasingly difficult, contributing to high mortality rates. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated the incidence and severity of these infections, especially in ICU settings. Several clinical factors were associated with higher mortality, including male sex, underlying conditions like diabetes and hypertension, use of invasive devices, septic shock and prior antibiotic use. While this is a single-center, retrospective study, our findings are consistent with other reports and highlight the urgent need for improved infection control measures, early diagnosis and appropriate empirical therapy. Broader studies are needed to support the development of more effective strategies to reduce mortality from A. baumannii BSI.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding/Support

None.

Acknowledgements

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior is gratefully acknowledged for the funding. We also thank the Clinical and Laboratory Pathophysiology (State University of Londrina) for diagnostic support.

References

  1. Yehya A, Ezzeddine Z, Chakkour M, Dhaini Z, Bou Saba MS, Bou Saba AS, et al. The intricacies of Acinetobacter baumannii: a multifaceted comprehensive review of a multidrug-resistant pathogen and its clinical significance and implications. Front Microbiol. 2025;16:1565965.
  2. Ibrahim S, Al-Saryi N, Al-Kadmy IMS, Aziz SN. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii as an emerging concern in hospitals. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(10):6987-98.
  3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI. 2023.
  4. Costa RLD, Lamas CDC, Simvoulidis LFN, Espanha CA, Moreira LPM, Bonancim RAB, et al. Secondary infections in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 admitted to an intensive care unit: impact of gram-negative bacterial resistance. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2022;64:e6.
  5. Nguyen M, Joshi SG. Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii and its importance in hospital-acquired infections: A scientific review. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;131(6):2715-38.
  6. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Nota Técnica nº 74/2022 – CGLAB/DAEVS/SVS/MS. ANVISA; 2022.
  7. Antochevis LC, Wilhelm CM, Arns B, Sganzerla D, Sudbrack LO, Nogueira TCRL, et al. WHO priority antimicrobial resistance in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium healthcare-associated bloodstream infections in Brazil (Ascension): a prospective, multicentre, observational study. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025;43:101004.
  8. Polly M, De Almeida BL, Lennon RP, Cortês MF, Costa SF, Guimarães T. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in an acute care hospital in Brazil. Am J Infect Control. 2022;50(1):32-8.
  9. Chotiprasitsakul D, Ao-udomsuk K, Santanirand P. Impact of COVID-19 on epidemiology and mortality risk factors in patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in a tertiary hospital in Thailand. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2025;43:155-61.
  10. Cogliati Dezza F, Arcari G, Alessi F, Valeri S, Curtolo A, Sacco F, et al. Clinical impact of COVID-19 on multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli bloodstream infections in an intensive care unit: Two pandemics compared. Antibiotics. 2022;11(7):926.
  11. Lodise TP, Nguyen ST, Margiotta C, Cai B. Clinical burden of Acinetobacter baumannii, including carbapenem-resistant strains, in hospitalized adults in the USA between 2018 and 2022. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25(1):549.
  12. Romanin P, Palermo RL, Cavalini JF, Fávaro LDS, De Paula-Petroli SB, Fernandes EV, et al. Multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a tertiary hospital in Brazil: carbapenemase genes and epidemic clonal complexes in a 10-year study. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25(9):1365-73.
  13. Jalali Y, Liptáková A, Jalali M, Payer J. Moving toward extensively drug-resistant: four-year antimicrobial resistance trends of Acinetobacter baumannii in Slovakia. Antibiotics. 2023;12(7):1200.
  14. Lima WG, Brito JCM, Cardoso BG, Cardoso VN, De Paiva MC, De Lima ME, et al. Rate of polymyxin resistance among Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(8):1427-38.
  15. Della Rocca MT, Panetta V, Durante A, Bucci L, Matano A, Annecchiarico A, et al. Pathogen distribution and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bloodstream infections in a Southern Italian hospital: 2016-2021 surveillance. New Microbiol. 2023;46(1):29-36.
  16. Spiliopoulou A, Giannopoulou I, Assimakopoulos SF, Jelastopulu E, Bartzavali C, Marangos M, et al. Laboratory surveillance of Acinetobacter spp. bloodstream infections in a tertiary university hospital during a 9-year period. Trop Med. 2023;8(11):503.
  17. Appaneal HJ, Lopes VV, LaPlante KL, Caffrey AR. Treatment, clinical outcomes and predictors of mortality among hospitalized patients with Acinetobacter baumannii Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(3):e01975-21.
  18. Alrahmany D, Omar AF, Alreesi A, Harb G, Ghazi IM. Acinetobacter baumannii infection-related mortality in hospitalized patients: risk factors and potential stewardship targets. Antibiotics. 2022;11(8):1086.
  19. Leung CH, Liu CP. Diabetic status and blood glucose and their relationship to mortality in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex bacteremia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2019;52(4):654-62.
  20. Xu J, Xu Y, Zheng X. Comparison of pneumonia- and non-pneumonia-related Acinetobacter baumannii complex bacteremia: a single-center retrospective study. Am J Infect Control. 2023;51(5):567-73.
  21. Lan M, Dongmei K, Guodong S, Haifeng Y, Guofeng C, Mengting C, et al. Risk factors for bacteremic pneumonia and 28-day mortality in patients with Acinetobacter baumannii BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):448.
  22. Magrini E, Rando E, Liguoro B, Salvati F, Vecchio PD, Fantoni M, et al. Risk factors associated with Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. CMI Commun. 2025;2(1):105060.
  23. Meng X, Fu J, Zheng Y, Qin W, Yang H, Cao D, et al. Ten-year changes in Acinetobacter baumannii complex bloodstream infections in ICUs in eastern China: a retrospective cohort study. Front Med. 2021;8:715213.
  24. Li L, Chen D, Liu P, Dai L, Tang Z, Yi S, et al. Risk factors for development and mortality of bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Infect Drug Resist. 2024;17:5699-706.
  25. Du X, Xu X, Yao J, Deng K, Chen S, Shen Z, et al. Predictors of mortality in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control. 2019;47(9):1140-5.
  26. Alenazi TA, Shaman MSB, Suliman DM, Alanazi TA, Altawalbeh SM, Alshareef H, et al. Impact of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in critically ill patients with or without COVID-19. Healthcare. 2023;11(4):487.

Pedro Olimpio Siqueira Castilho1*, Fernanda Martelli Takahashi1, Maria Julia Onça Moreira1, Larissa Sugiura1, Alanis C Cardoso1, Tatiana de Carvalho Caldas1, Gabriela de Souza Barbosa1, Marcia RE Perugini1, Marsileni Pelisson1, Floristher E Carrara1, Eliana Carolina Vespero1
1Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Health Sciences Center, State University of Londrina, Brazil

*Correspondence author: Pedro Olimpio Siqueira Castilho, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Health Sciences Center, State University of Londrina, Brazil;
Email: [email protected]

Pedro Olimpio Siqueira Castilho1*, Fernanda Martelli Takahashi1, Maria Julia Onça Moreira1, Larissa Sugiura1, Alanis C Cardoso1, Tatiana de Carvalho Caldas1, Gabriela de Souza Barbosa1, Marcia RE Perugini1, Marsileni Pelisson1, Floristher E Carrara1, Eliana Carolina Vespero1
1Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Health Sciences Center, State University of Londrina, Brazil

*Correspondence author: Pedro Olimpio Siqueira Castilho, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Health Sciences Center, State University of Londrina, Brazil;
Email: [email protected]

Copyright© 2025 by Castilho POS, et al. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation: Castilho POS, et al. Clinical Features Associated with A. baumannii BSI Mortality Clinical Features Associated with Acinetobacter baumannii Bloodstream Infections Mortality in a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Brazil. J Clin Immunol Microbiol. 2025;6(3):1-10.