Allegations of Research Misconduct Policy

The Journal of Clinical Medical Research upholds the highest standards of integrity and ethical conduct in scientific publishing. In adherence to the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), we have implemented a robust policy for addressing allegations of research misconduct. Whether pertaining to a published article or a manuscript undergoing peer review, our approach to handling complaints of author misconduct is characterized by sensitivity, discretion, and confidentiality.

Reporting research misconduct

The journal’s editorial office welcomes reports of suspected research misconduct via our designated contact form. Complainants are encouraged to provide detailed information outlining their concerns regarding an article submitted to or published in the journal.

Detailed complaints

Complaints should clearly delineate the nature and specifics of the alleged misconduct. For instance, in cases involving plagiarism, complainants are urged to identify the plagiarized content and reference both the original source and the suspected article.

Investigation process

Upon receiving a complaint, the editorial office initiates a thorough investigation, which may involve consultation with the editor of the journal and the corresponding author(s) of the implicated article.

Author response

The corresponding author(s) are afforded the opportunity to respond to the allegations, providing explanations supported by factual evidence.

Resolution actions

Should the author(s) admit to the misconduct, appropriate corrective measures are taken. For published articles, this may entail issuing an erratum or retraction, with any disagreements over wording addressed through careful deliberation. In instances where the misconduct is identified during the peer review process, the process may proceed with relevant modifications made by the author(s).

Nonresponse or unsatisfactory explanation

Failure to respond within the stipulated timeframe or providing an unsatisfactory explanation may result in the permanent retraction or rejection of the article. In such cases, the editorial team may seek guidance from experts affiliated with the relevant institution or other authorities as deemed necessary.

Communication and conclusion

Once the matter has been resolved, the complainant is promptly notified of the outcome. The case is considered concluded following the resolution of the issue, and all parties involved are treated with the utmost respect and professionalism throughout the process.

At the Journal of Clinical Medical Research, we are committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific literature and ensuring transparency and accountability in all aspects of our publication process.